Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932099AbXAFTUp (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Jan 2007 14:20:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932100AbXAFTUp (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Jan 2007 14:20:45 -0500 Received: from [139.30.44.16] ([139.30.44.16]:10832 "EHLO gockel.physik3.uni-rostock.de" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932099AbXAFTUo (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Jan 2007 14:20:44 -0500 Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 20:20:42 +0100 (CET) From: Tim Schmielau To: Stefan Richter cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc3 regression? hdparm shows 1/2...1/3 the throughput In-Reply-To: <459FE2AF.2020507@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Message-ID: References: <459FE2AF.2020507@s5r6.in-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 551 Lines: 16 On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Stefan Richter wrote: > Did anybody else notice this? The result of "hdparm -t" under 2.6.20-rc > seems to be less than half of what you get on 2.6.19. However, disk I/O > did *not* get slower according to bonnie++. yes. See http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/2/75 for the solution. Tim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/