Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp283491pxb; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 13:35:59 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy2M6sjjk+GudBGLaNQgN3FWSLVI1gtew8t2tS6tkJA8hWf6f0gn9vNcsg0fw5MpXi8xeBO X-Received: by 2002:a92:ca49:: with SMTP id q9mr1607882ilo.49.1636407359685; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 13:35:59 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1636407359; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=hdWMk69VXwobm7ePnc69D6Y5kj4dRRZHEQycVtDEu+DSfuGoRRmvaW/JiPRlIUnVcz eGIghtyIu59Ri7G9+O3SG1gwDpYpj/obG9AIS8OXUbmtSWMSH/JqC40m1K1ClnwfTv2h UWdaP0M5rXFmxRsE8fqHPow651/Jh19YccpBGAOSPBGIyRBzF38l8xaGoaLVx6MNEl4C qOGqsJkywvDuD3JQMtw80Ymmn1yvQyGyVzZAxvb9HqmPBrH7MkSSfgK0/rj36v+Tc9pk jxF//9kDWV5VfDCGnkW5/M4pBkLrPbYvRiNvWO29K1isH4RqwA6J2nMvNeiQJPZ3eyMV CYeA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=HG4CoPawu4SPLPpdIKEqQaMZVlQr+zrP4AYDJJtkl68=; b=X5R+ut6ESqaS6Pvc0sThFXQ0AGLdPjzvQEsBIMWsk7aLiQwayPrqrcUzeOcxUMmPYC HCUAsSkxqFWkcXT7pt7wxKwEA36b5yZWDeYMlvA8x+39KE+4aQIBql8x6PJT27kTzubw /V/TXdXJ5TW1xhBKzI9HAODouDbjbtC6y6bfEEN/oYhyrSDQTQCDewJm5EC63qKk6Jto +t5cCfflDNDOqXO96N2jGRd5IIZxCbJnadSNLdx2TKKMqI7NFoF0+4vhv9y0uN7ITQhe cflB0mtJzLGb3SBnpenyRgtYPXH7vhu+PCFat+Iz3KiqaJVoCenIl0lJbq8GG8GF82Ga N27w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e17si2674165iow.92.2021.11.08.13.35.45; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 13:35:59 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238542AbhKHQRM (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 8 Nov 2021 11:17:12 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:12416 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236038AbhKHQRL (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Nov 2021 11:17:11 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10162"; a="232098289" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.87,218,1631602800"; d="scan'208";a="232098289" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Nov 2021 08:14:17 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.87,218,1631602800"; d="scan'208";a="503082774" Received: from iweiny-desk2.sc.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.3.52.147]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Nov 2021 08:14:16 -0800 Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 08:14:16 -0800 From: Ira Weiny To: Christophe JAILLET Cc: dan.j.williams@intel.com, vishal.l.verma@intel.com, dave.jiang@intel.com, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvdimm/pmem: Fix an error handling path in 'pmem_attach_disk()' Message-ID: <20211108161416.GD3538886@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> References: <20211107171157.GC3538886@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> <050385c3-7707-76cb-c580-c64d43456462@wanadoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <050385c3-7707-76cb-c580-c64d43456462@wanadoo.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1 (2018-12-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 06:20:14PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > Le 07/11/2021 ? 18:11, Ira Weiny a ?crit?: > > On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 06:27:11PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > > > If 'devm_init_badblocks()' fails, a previous 'blk_alloc_disk()' call must > > > be undone. > > > > I think this is a problem... > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET > > > --- > > > This patch is speculative. Several fixes on error handling paths have been > > > done recently, but this one has been left as-is. There was maybe a good > > > reason that I have missed for that. So review with care! > > > > > > I've not been able to identify a Fixes tag that please me :( > > > --- > > > drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c | 5 +++-- > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c > > > index fe7ece1534e1..c37a1e6750b3 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c > > > +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c > > > @@ -490,8 +490,9 @@ static int pmem_attach_disk(struct device *dev, > > > nvdimm_namespace_disk_name(ndns, disk->disk_name); > > > set_capacity(disk, (pmem->size - pmem->pfn_pad - pmem->data_offset) > > > / 512); > > > - if (devm_init_badblocks(dev, &pmem->bb)) > > > - return -ENOMEM; > > > + rc = devm_init_badblocks(dev, &pmem->bb); > > > + if (rc) > > > + goto out; > > > > But I don't see this 'out' label in the function currently? Was that part of > > your patch missing? > > Hi, > the patch is based on the latest linux-next. > See [1]. The 'out' label exists there and is already used. Ah I see. Sorry. > > In fact, I run an own-made coccinelle script which tries to spot mix-up > between return and goto. > In this case, we have a 'return -ENOMEM' after a 'goto out' which looks > spurious. > Yes agreed. I was looking at Linus' kernel not linux-next sorry. Sorry for the noise, Ira > Hence, my patch. > > [1]:https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c#n512 > > CJ > > > > > Ira > > > > > nvdimm_badblocks_populate(nd_region, &pmem->bb, &bb_range); > > > disk->bb = &pmem->bb; > > > -- > > > 2.30.2 > > > > > >