Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp1007417pxb; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 03:43:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwyxzY2xlJUTQet/F3QtONp3AhMpSKJpezbIO/h1UxUraEWVRGoRKgGlURiXLoiPLhA/Y3Z X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:140d:: with SMTP id t13mr4413394iov.176.1636458221452; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 03:43:41 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1636458221; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=oiYzU2tMT8tFeAorGQsYIINEK0Hrr27uA856Rk6SUz7X6ORqkQfDgjeuL7ccc8x/1S SA7V19CmkcjZPX5sS2YBwpUca6tkvGuPtl0HVlku53tlsn6skRbYr6nU58wmTHGL7WT5 s7SEkp+C5x49R3NXZl94p5xvQdhlPNXnaUzvSXYqYw38YJ3SZxmKRT2NVA9qCdGCNmGL Ilvj5houbM2cCArNHuGAyr+kzGs+SM8R+/PXHyjVUBASOI1bLISulzqnaKbIYK/Hri+c W3wIebfjPEXMxKqnKazdl05KtMTRl7AEAn5v9b8e89rqUXhBBb3K3q8EEodUVTycsv7q 01VQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:references:cc:to:from :subject; bh=mfgoKFFEDBAJVdPC131lji2qdIML06udZ+ueRgkzh10=; b=g4ZdUpW8zC3nhku7/X+IEm8r4gOG2zYLkce//e8BQqH7D6ygr5hwi/ymTEDuCjlkfk 94DUZXGLMx8lIybDE4sHcjd+Gq5mbZz+HsVYi9K7byd/Elcndv/OENTgcS7KqlZ/r4kC iGwOYhckBUdgcBgKLHN+r+EX3+EJnnJAdHP3DqJiK0FQ9rGxrRYlaHOaoh5f/3c2zPI/ 6dbSBZj92Xf0NtR9hszGtoxce7e5EtzWCHpAHPdkNM6iCX1nG4ARjtHLoaYTJ1zx8foC ENzl0583XX0Dw/lGNxea55MhlPrZ7K3+l8Aqs3XzafqAVWO7nvloC1SAryfnBD6pnaiM fQnQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d1si45383276ilg.74.2021.11.09.03.43.28; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 03:43:41 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237422AbhKICJ3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 8 Nov 2021 21:09:29 -0500 Received: from szxga08-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.255]:27123 "EHLO szxga08-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231229AbhKICJ2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Nov 2021 21:09:28 -0500 Received: from dggeme756-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by szxga08-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4HpBB44NCcz1DDCd; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 10:04:28 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.110.136] (10.67.110.136) by dggeme756-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.15; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 10:06:40 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Fix possible memleak in drm_client_modeset_probe From: He Ying To: , , , , CC: , References: <20211022012623.97631-1-heying24@huawei.com> Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 10:06:40 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20211022012623.97631-1-heying24@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.67.110.136] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.180) To dggeme756-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.102) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org kindly ping... ?? 2021/10/22 9:26, He Ying ะด??: > I got memory leak as follows when doing fault injection test: > > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1214 at drm_mode_config_cleanup+0x689/0x890 [drm] > RIP: 0010:drm_mode_config_cleanup+0x689/0x890 [drm] > Call Trace: > ? tracer_hardirqs_on+0x33/0x520 > ? drm_mode_config_reset+0x3f0/0x3f0 [drm] > ? trace_event_raw_event_rcu_torture_read+0x2c0/0x2c0 > ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc+0x1d/0x50 > ? call_rcu+0x489/0x15e0 > ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x63/0x2d0 > ? write_comp_data+0x2a/0x90 > ? drm_mode_config_cleanup+0x890/0x890 [drm] > drm_managed_release+0x1fa/0x4f0 [drm] > drm_dev_release+0x72/0xb0 [drm] > devm_drm_dev_init_release+0x81/0xa0 [drm] > release_nodes+0xba/0x3b0 > ... > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae > > and then an error message: > > [drm:drm_mode_config_cleanup [drm]] *ERROR* connector SPI-1 leaked! > > When krealloc() in drm_client_modeset_probe() fails, it > goes to the label 'free_connectors'. However, krealloc() > is between drm_connector_list_iter_begin() and *_end(). > Going to the label directly is not a good idea. Because > iter->conn is not cleaned up if so. Fix the problem by > going to the label outside drm_connector_list_iter_end(). > > Signed-off-by: He Ying > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c > index ced09c7c06f9..7ac88ae93f38 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c > @@ -789,7 +789,7 @@ int drm_client_modeset_probe(struct drm_client_dev *client, unsigned int width, > tmp = krealloc(connectors, (connector_count + 1) * sizeof(*connectors), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!tmp) { > ret = -ENOMEM; > - goto free_connectors; > + break; > } > > connectors = tmp; > @@ -798,6 +798,9 @@ int drm_client_modeset_probe(struct drm_client_dev *client, unsigned int width, > } > drm_connector_list_iter_end(&conn_iter); > > + if (ret) > + goto free_connectors; > + > if (!connector_count) > return 0; >