Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: power: Add description about new
 callback for EM registration
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rafael@kernel.org,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
References: <20211102180144.1647-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com>
From:   Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Message-ID: <22bdfc88-983d-fc86-0abb-404eedf03274@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 Nov 2021 10:38:51 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20211102180144.1647-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Rafael,


On 11/2/21 6:01 PM, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> The Energy Model (EM) registration for CPUs should now be done using
> a dedicated callback added recently into CPUFreq framework and drivers.
> 
> Commit c17495b01b72 ("cpufreq: Add callback to register with energy model")
> 
> The callback guaranties that the EM registration is called at the right
> time during driver setup. To avoid mistakes update the documentation
> to align with the existing code implementation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
> ---
>   Documentation/power/energy-model.rst | 31 ++++++++++++++--------------
>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 


Gentle ping. Could you have a look at these documentation
two patches and maybe pick them, please?
They are trying to solve some confusion discussed with our partners
recently.

Regards,
Lukasz