Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8395:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n21csp433250pxh; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 13:05:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwrUf7cOAqM2Oe/E6wDJuxla4W58YIST7D3biHeOl/0KUY+rSpCft2o1g8lQumtQtHQAVaa X-Received: by 2002:a6b:4e07:: with SMTP id c7mr6803587iob.23.1636491925688; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 13:05:25 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1636491925; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=F+nt2LdGok1Zkt+zlTduoTGW8x2yrYAshoAUE8r1TtCdMmn0lcRKg986trr1H6aYYY bAzCFaqP3JV9mhLD8lIQVpKqijL6QDVvi7YA1Es2mzsKELrRvsrx8enyZXnBBN4QfkRn QY+UG8a6GtLwfEwsvdXgDqoB4PN3OyOLQG0jymr2Z5JMrqlCjTyyohqEqPDU0PffVsOY NTbdmCUFNuUYjE+BbVUEjrIYM9/2O4QeOjrrmwhgXYWymk+8Ly6JC+fi+B2xZiJ2sqQm Cqc4oXypZ7MsDwA1dh3K5IcweSXzenDmEMAVU1MeCYVFJWcKB0V/keWOINMXZHMQ+1jx chpA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=ijkZGpaFpq6LV8Gg8reo+SGCxLMW6UmnTU/srKB0UIc=; b=Wz4MhoqBzCpDMvIcbnBOun6ag59c2fRwfYnit9w4DyVoOJNxO55d4aUUyBW0o9oZaR 6z9wsIJ/Q6tPLBr3TyKjFVhPQA7uu1K8U+F65GFJwglso0AKtPCV1KrkcxfXiyvSZoN/ ZBzgNif6ePt4E0IvEOg/ntsLbekPownEPzTU/EnhSGfDs6sWA6wz+G5jU9DiHSWZ3J9Y wjLiZyBYDi6pvU/dax+jQuzexQ4pp6DbFYA80tqGgFjtZNedORY1j0l5HSHMzDNJ/avF Fi3zeAe0WuwzE51i7DdC0PgPlheVFEvvmKBmZoI01yeQau9XgKdRjAs59as2A/O5mIP8 MgMw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@bytedance-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.s=20210112 header.b=T3YiUPJY; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=bytedance.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g6si11483465jaq.67.2021.11.09.13.05.09; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 13:05:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@bytedance-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.s=20210112 header.b=T3YiUPJY; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=bytedance.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S245408AbhKIKni (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 9 Nov 2021 05:43:38 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33086 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S245419AbhKIKnh (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2021 05:43:37 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x635.google.com (mail-pl1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::635]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10721C061766 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 02:40:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x635.google.com with SMTP id p18so20084611plf.13 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 02:40:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bytedance-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ijkZGpaFpq6LV8Gg8reo+SGCxLMW6UmnTU/srKB0UIc=; b=T3YiUPJYSknWJO0k0ZBPc+Hfc2pdbROPOfOnZ4i3Bzpubl9KUT7aLNzl70vpfrZFd4 S8PgbtElpzfz+ter7uV5y4U8QWPW0Md0+qantVOPX3mxmhU//7vzBGlJ7L/jxFxuU3dF be45f4qIlcndP6Em8lOmWG6KHlo6gZsW20iKtn/FmXagbz8rKmwu10WBo+M3RWJo7qQC LLjeIxWF61EQUqZa2aIO+rWRbG2+wVmDr6cpa9AWL16MI5lAeaPKFMjAACnqAOtmH8Xd j0UA8kXzVVj+gd/r9HnVZiYnP+wKj9L9NR/RjfVPuejWnVT6CvC6rv1GPRvJ24UJPl/u DUmQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ijkZGpaFpq6LV8Gg8reo+SGCxLMW6UmnTU/srKB0UIc=; b=BVQrauCJ3aFTMrntc0FXh0RrSqUdOU1Jr+7UHtKRtMRHjN9BvAEoZvekwPZGJBP2EJ 5UA6WpMHF3iFc/KX4jau5W/47dqzZPw0dMXd/grWyln174SRtt1VOHY8UPdL8zAU+TVv IZRo6ZYvtBehw/3L5954yrBX6npwQdmvqNE23sXUdu4ELNFFfDiCGMh2s4C3d1ZKoonB DG1JNufgKvAUx8J8787jh/grqMsfQvII1o5Z0FVuIsuhjLhJyFsW6IKT7XhyzIOcvPqG qy2/xVOlcNXCRGsZAd63XUsaoseD0pbKRAA/fHbA6CEBm2Ih7Z+mQOcfMqb242PW7e44 nxqg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531pX8Xs6yvGPtdATpBuuUvmehLjQdYrAicuGqBn31WuZ/yjV155 VSpHRlXfhLVU+RPkaj4eSC6vUA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:2fc7:: with SMTP id n7mr6006745pjm.141.1636454451646; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 02:40:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.254.105.98] ([139.177.225.240]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s2sm8895919pfg.124.2021.11.09.02.40.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Nov 2021 02:40:51 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v1] sched/numa: add per-process numa_balancing To: Mel Gorman Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org References: <20211027132633.86653-1-ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com> <20211028153028.GP3891@suse.de> <20211029083751.GR3891@suse.de> <20211109091951.GW3891@suse.de> From: Gang Li Message-ID: <7de25e1b-e548-b8b5-dda5-6a2e001f3c1a@bytedance.com> Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 18:40:43 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20211109091951.GW3891@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/9/21 5:19 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 04:28:28PM +0800, Gang Li wrote: >> If the global tuning affects default behaviour and the prctl >> affects specific behaviour. Then when prctl specifies >> numa_balancing for a process, there is no way for the >> global tuning to affect that process. > > While I think it's very likely that the common case will be to disable > NUMA balancing for specific processes, > prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING,PR_SET_NUMA_BALANCING,1) should still be > meaningful. > I'm still a bit confused. If we really want to enable/disable numa_balancing for all processes, but some of them override the global numa_balancing using prctl, what should we do? Do we iterate through these processes to enable/disable them individually?