Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8395:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n21csp611904pxh; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 16:10:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyWjeDSWa8c3qUuVfenplHw4vu0ZhAjToHrxgmINHD0RNLlHbyrySpFdkevp49fW0BOJc58 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1bcc:: with SMTP id x12mr8629067ilv.106.1636503018745; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 16:10:18 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1636503018; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=iv/vV0tqLmUENRHFY005Zl1dw2zmd1TOgJlycKB5nRNWg7ktxzkkMA6u0xI3kl8arX BVwckmaOrOsYt5FKFi3VUn2Wm+FddKbU5u15Qhiz4ttfRJlhuyiCWz91eU5M5lwuy2hP hITMrAy6FrZJpJlTmnAhMqLSrgjIDaisDO78c9Q40S02lAP50MuQI8Hf4KnU3UNbK/wr TayUSQInZj+0bN1lSvLVhrjrT4YAdNXN43uhnzgNABlaGGoEvNCUYXAk0BtKSyWaOjOb CvIkDSXrr93Vm9IIWn1Zi40aj6O/g0a0C5Ub1uBsNbti8YMAj9P3+M6yThDu8mYmPQ9j vHgA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=EeoeqnN42iO2HBA0In6NdJ3XgDyDHyboIkYWjl3H/UQ=; b=R4KC4bK+e+YRLPCa7GI3nUY1K6h1M8nQJ1nsVQ22Si69+7O6ap/Uvg+s6NJ0LfJYC+ P/DiAp0ikqPnDS7/iZ+Ox7abSOu0WEqHKEa+rJzNKlY7wKyNFuKjktY3S3JB0TSs1oKB bBwWKWCa7gsvaIMW3nzNKSGpUtpOF9kmp0/qh+OsjNv2bvroPB2XTwktgEVnv0N8lK+T OyUvy8dFVwT04veWcXR2DSm1HSnLgU2DWPsx01l0bmMiWGYNIywZyb3bNUgk7ecXGsrN /1USaamLRQoaS0wx+CVT9yi+4LXuAanrDCDujZZ+GdX6WtDyH2kdx+h0vAO9QESj9rQ0 knCg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=HpW+w9yy; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f11si50676753ila.39.2021.11.09.16.10.06; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 16:10:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=HpW+w9yy; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240787AbhKIRWv (ORCPT + 97 others); Tue, 9 Nov 2021 12:22:51 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:20569 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238356AbhKIRWu (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2021 12:22:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1636478404; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EeoeqnN42iO2HBA0In6NdJ3XgDyDHyboIkYWjl3H/UQ=; b=HpW+w9yyZkJtbdct8+iAnry/wqMwA4rWXeXjMWm9shPHZNMOYUjlkl+f2JyUeM3Haj0jq2 gstePxzbRqhS7Ms+65UzNmYF520Hwkt309QPRiriiym4kBN7LeI/6f2BVN90LHoFYMUtDK MPiQ0VPdsVQ68UHaMHcyFn2Vegf/imU= Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-152-EwWiNOLpMJaQlKcNXo9l_Q-1; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 12:20:02 -0500 X-MC-Unique: EwWiNOLpMJaQlKcNXo9l_Q-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id k5-20020a7bc3050000b02901e081f69d80so8017509wmj.8 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 09:20:01 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=EeoeqnN42iO2HBA0In6NdJ3XgDyDHyboIkYWjl3H/UQ=; b=fJFx0W0evUgyEqzqOXAAo2k5xirKH0gI5MxrlY5MOYI2D5TfdTvkYb4B7ya7wMl9FJ KoNZeZiq/wEVJ2s00YSyRnE5lPRYc0R7KMtbitgG1m4Pcf4q67BXzXclxdRkTsyJjzSi JeHP/SGDKvKnL6obUjgAt9Mlc8Uc5nIdmo6NgmOWUUbRl/h2IOA3hKRjDc1YM30oiAem k5KqpiX1q6TwydyOyfbbyX3eDekPNmO/jZ7lq9UY+O/7lwcsJOxCt3GwtHnnEb1EUJ1t FJurt9q5naWdvG5ThA9WeOfevEZbHwN0ejc3Q325MZY4yYhCZA8ENYI0M4TJUq29sLlk rApw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ox5/uDA2XDWAJWBD984W6IsWCNrXsU2p6HrsqKuICCSp+JfeH xqBPnEbET6AgOQdGflckFE+1EBguVu5hhzu386AnJrR6Sy20IVVFzFcBXHieXZl4GSsLu965Uuk fl1CsYZqNQj88BAMt21+EWRyc X-Received: by 2002:adf:f448:: with SMTP id f8mr11639333wrp.47.1636478400330; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 09:20:00 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:adf:f448:: with SMTP id f8mr11639296wrp.47.1636478400112; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 09:20:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2a01:e0a:59e:9d80:527b:9dff:feef:3874? ([2a01:e0a:59e:9d80:527b:9dff:feef:3874]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n8sm20410332wrp.95.2021.11.09.09.19.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Nov 2021 09:19:59 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/21] KVM: arm64: Support SDEI_EVENT_GET_INFO hypercall To: Gavin Shan , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu Cc: maz@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, will@kernel.org References: <20210815001352.81927-1-gshan@redhat.com> <20210815001352.81927-10-gshan@redhat.com> From: Eric Auger Message-ID: <03e9b1fb-af79-69bf-f242-00fef3b11a81@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 18:19:58 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210815001352.81927-10-gshan@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Gavin, On 8/15/21 2:13 AM, Gavin Shan wrote: > This supports SDEI_EVENT_GET_INFO hypercall. It's used by the guest > to retrieve various information about the supported (exported) events, > including type, signaled, route mode and affinity for the shared > events. > > Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan > --- > arch/arm64/kvm/sdei.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sdei.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sdei.c > index b95b8c4455e1..5dfa74b093f1 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sdei.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sdei.c > @@ -415,6 +415,80 @@ static unsigned long kvm_sdei_hypercall_status(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > return ret; > } > > +static unsigned long kvm_sdei_hypercall_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > +{ > + struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm; > + struct kvm_sdei_kvm *ksdei = kvm->arch.sdei; > + struct kvm_sdei_vcpu *vsdei = vcpu->arch.sdei; > + struct kvm_sdei_event *kse = NULL; > + struct kvm_sdei_kvm_event *kske = NULL; > + unsigned long event_num = smccc_get_arg1(vcpu); > + unsigned long event_info = smccc_get_arg2(vcpu); > + unsigned long ret = SDEI_SUCCESS; > + > + /* Sanity check */ > + if (!(ksdei && vsdei)) { > + ret = SDEI_NOT_SUPPORTED; > + goto out; > + } > + > + if (!kvm_sdei_is_valid_event_num(event_num)) { > + ret = SDEI_INVALID_PARAMETERS; > + goto out; > + } > + > + /* > + * Check if the KVM event exists. The event might have been > + * registered, we need fetch the information from the registered s/fetch/to fetch > + * event in that case. > + */ > + spin_lock(&ksdei->lock); > + kske = kvm_sdei_find_kvm_event(kvm, event_num); > + kse = kske ? kske->kse : NULL; > + if (!kse) { > + kse = kvm_sdei_find_event(kvm, event_num); > + if (!kse) { > + ret = SDEI_INVALID_PARAMETERS; this should have already be covered by !kvm_sdei_is_valid_event_num I think (although this latter only checks the since static event num with KVM owner mask) > + goto unlock; > + } > + } > + > + /* Retrieve the requested information */ > + switch (event_info) { > + case SDEI_EVENT_INFO_EV_TYPE: > + ret = kse->state.type; > + break; > + case SDEI_EVENT_INFO_EV_SIGNALED: > + ret = kse->state.signaled; > + break; > + case SDEI_EVENT_INFO_EV_PRIORITY: > + ret = kse->state.priority; > + break; > + case SDEI_EVENT_INFO_EV_ROUTING_MODE: > + case SDEI_EVENT_INFO_EV_ROUTING_AFF: > + if (kse->state.type != SDEI_EVENT_TYPE_SHARED) { > + ret = SDEI_INVALID_PARAMETERS; > + break; > + } > + > + if (event_info == SDEI_EVENT_INFO_EV_ROUTING_MODE) { > + ret = kske ? kske->state.route_mode : > + SDEI_EVENT_REGISTER_RM_ANY; no, if event is not registered (!kske) DENIED should be returned > + } else { same here > + ret = kske ? kske->state.route_affinity : 0; > + } > + > + break; > + default: > + ret = SDEI_INVALID_PARAMETERS; > + } > + > +unlock: > + spin_unlock(&ksdei->lock); > +out: > + return ret; > +} > + > int kvm_sdei_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > u32 func = smccc_get_function(vcpu); > @@ -446,6 +520,8 @@ int kvm_sdei_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > ret = kvm_sdei_hypercall_status(vcpu); > break; > case SDEI_1_0_FN_SDEI_EVENT_GET_INFO: > + ret = kvm_sdei_hypercall_info(vcpu); > + break; > case SDEI_1_0_FN_SDEI_EVENT_ROUTING_SET: > case SDEI_1_0_FN_SDEI_PE_MASK: > case SDEI_1_0_FN_SDEI_PE_UNMASK: > Eric