Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964836AbXAGSaA (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Jan 2007 13:30:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964823AbXAGSaA (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Jan 2007 13:30:00 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:36426 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964836AbXAGS37 (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Jan 2007 13:29:59 -0500 Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 18:29:46 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Pavel Machek Cc: Ingo Molnar , kvm-devel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [announce] [patch] KVM paravirtualization for Linux Message-ID: <20070107182946.GA8158@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Pavel Machek , Ingo Molnar , kvm-devel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity References: <20070105215223.GA5361@elte.hu> <20070106130817.GB5660@ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070106130817.GB5660@ucw.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 635 Lines: 14 On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 01:08:18PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote: > Does this make Xen obsolete? I mean... we have xen patches in suse > kernels, should we keep updating them, or just drop them in favour of > KVM? After all the Novell Marketing Hype you'll probably have to keep Xen ;-) Except for that I suspect a paravirt kvm or lhype might be the better hypervisor choice in the long term. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/