Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965019AbXAGTya (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:54:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965021AbXAGTya (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:54:30 -0500 Received: from agminet01.oracle.com ([141.146.126.228]:50857 "EHLO agminet01.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965019AbXAGTya (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:54:30 -0500 Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 11:52:28 -0800 From: Randy Dunlap To: "J.H." Cc: Willy Tarreau , Andrew Morton , Pavel Machek , kernel list , hpa@zytor.com, webmaster@kernel.org Subject: Re: [KORG] Re: kernel.org lies about latest -mm kernel Message-Id: <20070107115228.15f25301.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <1168111275.2505.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20061214223718.GA3816@elf.ucw.cz> <20061216094421.416a271e.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20061216095702.3e6f1d1f.akpm@osdl.org> <458434B0.4090506@oracle.com> <1166297434.26330.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20061219063413.GI24090@1wt.eu> <1166511171.26330.120.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070106103331.48150aed.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <1168111275.2505.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> Organization: Oracle Linux Eng. X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.0 (GTK+ 2.8.10; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3152 Lines: 68 On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 11:21:15 -0800 J.H. wrote: > It's an issue of load, and both machines are running 'hot' so to speak. > When the loads on the machines climbs our update rsyncs take longer to > complete (considering that our loads are completely based on I/O this > isn't surprising). More or less nothing has changed since: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/14/347 with the exception that git & gitweb > are no longer the concern we have (the caching layer I put into > kernel.org seems to be taking care of the worst problems we were seeing > and I have a couple more to put up this weekend), right now it's getting > loads between the two machines load evened out and lowering the number > of allowed rsyncs on each machine to better bound the load problem. Hi, I'm sure that all of this ext3fs etc. discussion is good, but let me clarify: I would be much happier if the kernel.org main page and the finger_banner info were updated at the same time that new tarballs were put onto kernel.org. Now someone may say that this is still the rsync/load problem, but from a customer perspective, it's bad. > On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 10:33 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 22:52:51 -0800 J.H. wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 07:34 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > > On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 11:30:34AM -0800, J.H. wrote: > > > > (...) > > > > > > > > > So we know the problem is there, and we are working on it - we are > > > > > getting e-mails about it if not daily than every other day or so. If > > > > > there are suggestions we are willing to hear them - but the general > > > > > feeling with the admins is that we are probably hitting the biggest > > > > > problems already. > > > > > > > > BTW, yesterday my 2.4 patches were not published, but I noticed that > > > > they were not even signed not bziped on hera. At first I simply thought > > > > it was related, but right now I have a doubt. Maybe the automatic script > > > > has been temporarily been disabled on hera too ? > > > > > > The script that deals with the uploads also deals with the packaging - > > > so yes the problem is related. > > > > and with the finger_banner and version info on www.kernel.org page? > > > > They currently say: > > > > The latest stable version of the Linux kernel is: 2.6.19.1 > > The latest prepatch for the stable Linux kernel tree is: 2.6.20-rc3 > > The latest snapshot for the stable Linux kernel tree is: 2.6.20-rc3-git4 > > The latest 2.4 version of the Linux kernel is: 2.4.34 > > The latest 2.2 version of the Linux kernel is: 2.2.26 > > The latest prepatch for the 2.2 Linux kernel tree is: 2.2.27-rc2 > > The latest -mm patch to the stable Linux kernels is: 2.6.20-rc2-mm1 > > > > > > but there are 2.6.20-rc3-git[567] and 2.6.20-rc3-mm1 out there, > > so when is the finger version info updated? --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/