MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20211101172127.3060453-1-pgonda@google.com> <20211101172127.3060453-5-pgonda@google.com>
 <952fa937-d139-bd90-825c-f7dfca8d8cb9@amd.com> <CAMkAt6qdNWP-Ka1N=0d16Q1TrbHPXPEkdLoxC8ndsyid-dqA6Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <d6fc38fa-1caa-289a-ae92-102a96638560@amd.com>
In-Reply-To: <d6fc38fa-1caa-289a-ae92-102a96638560@amd.com>
From:   Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Nov 2021 08:21:48 -0600
Message-ID: <CAMkAt6qBGckrBje6B0i5JTD5cK9ASViAZZrAPOcyzHmpVnmRdg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] crypto: ccp - Add SEV_INIT_EX support
To:     Tom Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>
Cc:     David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
        Marc Orr <marcorr@google.com>,
        Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
        John Allen <john.allen@amd.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 2:02 PM Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/1/21 2:18 PM, Peter Gonda wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 12:41 PM Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> wrote:
> >> On 11/1/21 12:21 PM, Peter Gonda wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >>> +
> >>> +     fp = filp_open(init_ex_path, O_RDONLY, 0);
> >>> +     if (IS_ERR(fp)) {
> >>> +             const int ret = PTR_ERR(fp);
> >>
> >> I don't think you need the "const" here.
> >
> > Sounds good, removed. I normally default to consting a variable if I
> > don't expect/want it to change. What guidance should I be following
> > here?
>
> Heh, I don't know... I guess since its in such a short scope it just read
> easier to me.  But, you're correct, const is appropriate here, so I guess
> feel free to leave it in if you want.

Thanks! I'll remove it here to be more consistent with this file.

>
> >
> >>
>
> ...
>
> >> "SEV: write successful to NV file\n"
> >
> > Updated all messages. Should have noted the "SEV: .." format.
>
> It's not like we were very consistent originally, but it would be nice to
> have the new messages start to maintain a consistency.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
> >