Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161229AbXAHLRY (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jan 2007 06:17:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161230AbXAHLRY (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jan 2007 06:17:24 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.183]:62504 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161229AbXAHLRX (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jan 2007 06:17:23 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <45A2356B.5050208@gmx.net> References: <45A22D69.3010905@gmx.net> <3d57814d0701080243n745fcddg8eaace0093e88a38@mail.gmail.com> <45A2356B.5050208@gmx.net> Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:17:20 +0100 To: Dirk , Trent Waddington From: Jay Vaughan Subject: Re: Gaming Interface Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:5cf4d1416b705699c92259bb5d2086df Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1788 Lines: 41 At 13:13 +0100 8/1/07, Dirk wrote: >Trent Waddington wrote: > > Call me crazy, but game manufacturers want directx right? You aint > > running that in the kernel. >They want something like DirectX that changes it's API less frequent >than DirectX and that compiles as a module because you don't want to run >it in the kernel. > Whats wrong with just using SDL/OpenGL? Thousands of games are made with SDL/OpenGL, and there are realms of Linux usage where this works just fine, especially for games (GP2X, etc). In case you didn't notice, plenty of pro Game Developers use SDL/OpenGL just fine for their needs, and get the job done without grumbling and groaning about needing to have their hands held through the process. I fail to see the reason this requirement has to be a 'kernel' interface, other than pure sheer laziness and inability to grok on the part of the so-called professional Game Developers. Gaming is only *one* kind of application for the Linux kernel - shall we burden the kernel with everything everyone wants just because people fail to understand the proper way to assemble a Linux-based kit for their specific application needs? (Hint: work with the distro builders.) Just my .2c, but anyone suggesting that API's be crowbar'ed into the kernel "just to make it easier to get what you want from a single source" is probably not as familiar with the underlying technology, nor the reasons for its structured organization, as they ought to be before making such suggestions .. -- ; Jay Vaughan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/