Date:   Mon, 8 Nov 2021 11:31:38 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Zhaolong Zhang <zhangzl2013@126.com>
Cc:     Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: drop cpu_missing since we have more capable
 mce_missing_cpus
Message-ID: <YYj8ir/UYnG/zVK4@zn.tnic>
References: <572d793c.f2e.17cede4cbf0.Coremail.zhangzl2013@126.com>
 <20211108082832.142436-1-zhangzl2013@126.com>
 <YYjuiHN1wKt82fjs@zn.tnic>
 <4d526023.3cde.17cff097bab.Coremail.zhangzl2013@126.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4d526023.3cde.17cff097bab.Coremail.zhangzl2013@126.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 06:13:04PM +0800, Zhaolong Zhang wrote:
> I was concerning that if I simply remove the cpu_missing code, we will lose the log in the
> situation where mca_cfg.tolerant > 1 and no_way_out is set afterwards.
> 
> Do you think we can safely ignore that situation?

Well, how likely is to have such a situation in practice?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette