Date:   Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:30:02 -0800
In-Reply-To: <20211110223010.1392399-1-bgardon@google.com>
Message-Id: <20211110223010.1392399-12-bgardon@google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
References: <20211110223010.1392399-1-bgardon@google.com>
Subject: [RFC 11/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor shadow_zero_check out of make_spte
From:   Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
        David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
        Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
        Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@gmail.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
        Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>,
        Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
        Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
        Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

In the interest of devloping a version of make_spte that can function
without a vCPU pointer, factor out the shadow_zero_mask to be an
additional argument to the function.

No functional change intended.


Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c | 11 +++++++----
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h |  3 ++-
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
index b7271daa06c5..d3b059e96c6e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
@@ -93,7 +93,8 @@ bool make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 	       struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, unsigned int pte_access,
 	       gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t pfn, u64 old_spte, bool prefetch,
 	       bool can_unsync, bool host_writable, bool ad_need_write_protect,
-	       u64 mt_mask, u64 *new_spte)
+	       u64 mt_mask, struct rsvd_bits_validate *shadow_zero_check,
+	       u64 *new_spte)
 {
 	int level = sp->role.level;
 	u64 spte = SPTE_MMU_PRESENT_MASK;
@@ -176,9 +177,9 @@ bool make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 	if (prefetch)
 		spte = mark_spte_for_access_track(spte);
 
-	WARN_ONCE(is_rsvd_spte(&vcpu->arch.mmu->shadow_zero_check, spte, level),
+	WARN_ONCE(is_rsvd_spte(shadow_zero_check, spte, level),
 		  "spte = 0x%llx, level = %d, rsvd bits = 0x%llx", spte, level,
-		  get_rsvd_bits(&vcpu->arch.mmu->shadow_zero_check, spte, level));
+		  get_rsvd_bits(shadow_zero_check, spte, level));
 
 	if ((spte & PT_WRITABLE_MASK) && kvm_slot_dirty_track_enabled(slot)) {
 		/* Enforced by kvm_mmu_hugepage_adjust. */
@@ -198,10 +199,12 @@ bool vcpu_make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 	bool ad_need_write_protect = kvm_vcpu_ad_need_write_protect(vcpu);
 	u64 mt_mask = static_call(kvm_x86_get_mt_mask)(vcpu, gfn,
 						       kvm_is_mmio_pfn(pfn));
+	struct rsvd_bits_validate *shadow_zero_check = &vcpu->arch.mmu->shadow_zero_check;
 
 	return make_spte(vcpu, sp, slot, pte_access, gfn, pfn, old_spte,
 			 prefetch, can_unsync, host_writable,
-			 ad_need_write_protect, mt_mask, new_spte);
+			 ad_need_write_protect, mt_mask, shadow_zero_check,
+			 new_spte);
 
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
index e739f2ebf844..6134a10487c4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
@@ -333,7 +333,8 @@ bool make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 	       struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, unsigned int pte_access,
 	       gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t pfn, u64 old_spte, bool prefetch,
 	       bool can_unsync, bool host_writable, bool ad_need_write_protect,
-	       u64 mt_mask, u64 *new_spte);
+	       u64 mt_mask, struct rsvd_bits_validate *shadow_zero_check,
+	       u64 *new_spte);
 bool vcpu_make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 		    struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
 		    unsigned int pte_access, gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t pfn,
-- 
2.34.0.rc0.344.g81b53c2807-goog