Date:   Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:30:03 -0800
In-Reply-To: <20211110223010.1392399-1-bgardon@google.com>
Message-Id: <20211110223010.1392399-13-bgardon@google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
References: <20211110223010.1392399-1-bgardon@google.com>
Subject: [RFC 12/19] KVM: x86/mmu: Replace vcpu argument with kvm pointer in make_spte
From:   Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
        David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
        Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
        Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@gmail.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
        Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>,
        Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
        Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
        Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

No that nothing in make_spte actually needs the vCPU argument, just
pass in a pointer to the struct kvm. This allows the function to be used
in situations where there is no relevant struct vcpu.

No functional change intended.


Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c | 8 ++++----
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
index d3b059e96c6e..d98723b14cec 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static bool kvm_is_mmio_pfn(kvm_pfn_t pfn)
 				     E820_TYPE_RAM);
 }
 
-bool make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
+bool make_spte(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 	       struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, unsigned int pte_access,
 	       gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t pfn, u64 old_spte, bool prefetch,
 	       bool can_unsync, bool host_writable, bool ad_need_write_protect,
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ bool make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 		 * e.g. it's write-tracked (upper-level SPs) or has one or more
 		 * shadow pages and unsync'ing pages is not allowed.
 		 */
-		if (mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(vcpu->kvm, slot, gfn, can_unsync, prefetch)) {
+		if (mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(kvm, slot, gfn, can_unsync, prefetch)) {
 			pgprintk("%s: found shadow page for %llx, marking ro\n",
 				 __func__, gfn);
 			wrprot = true;
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ bool make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 	if ((spte & PT_WRITABLE_MASK) && kvm_slot_dirty_track_enabled(slot)) {
 		/* Enforced by kvm_mmu_hugepage_adjust. */
 		WARN_ON(level > PG_LEVEL_4K);
-		mark_page_dirty_in_slot(vcpu->kvm, slot, gfn);
+		mark_page_dirty_in_slot(kvm, slot, gfn);
 	}
 
 	*new_spte = spte;
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ bool vcpu_make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 						       kvm_is_mmio_pfn(pfn));
 	struct rsvd_bits_validate *shadow_zero_check = &vcpu->arch.mmu->shadow_zero_check;
 
-	return make_spte(vcpu, sp, slot, pte_access, gfn, pfn, old_spte,
+	return make_spte(vcpu->kvm, sp, slot, pte_access, gfn, pfn, old_spte,
 			 prefetch, can_unsync, host_writable,
 			 ad_need_write_protect, mt_mask, shadow_zero_check,
 			 new_spte);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
index 6134a10487c4..5bb055688080 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ static inline u64 get_mmio_spte_generation(u64 spte)
 	return gen;
 }
 
-bool make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
+bool make_spte(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 	       struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, unsigned int pte_access,
 	       gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t pfn, u64 old_spte, bool prefetch,
 	       bool can_unsync, bool host_writable, bool ad_need_write_protect,
-- 
2.34.0.rc0.344.g81b53c2807-goog