Date:   Thu, 11 Nov 2021 08:45:35 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, steev@kali.org,
        sudeep.holla@arm.com, will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
        linux@armlinux.org.uk, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        rafael@kernel.org, amitk@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
        amit.kachhap@gmail.com, thara.gopinath@linaro.org,
        bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, agross@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Refactor thermal pressure update to avoid code
 duplication
Message-ID: <20211111031535.nvrngqqffdmw2jgz@vireshk-i7>
References: <20211109195714.7750-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20211109195714.7750-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52
Precedence: bulk

On 09-11-21, 19:57, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> This patch set v4 aims to refactor the thermal pressure update
> code. There are already two clients which do similar thing:
> convert the capped frequency value into the capacity of
> affected CPU and call the 'set' function to store the 
> reduced capacity into the per-cpu variable.
> There might be more than two of these users. In near future
> it will be scmi-cpufreq driver, which receives notification
> from FW about reduced frequency due to thermal. Other vendors
> might follow. Let's avoid code duplication and potential
> conversion bugs. Move the conversion code into the arch_topology.c
> where the capacity calculation setup code and thermal pressure sit.
> 
> Apart from that $subject patches, there is one patch (3/5) which fixes
> issue in qcom-cpufreq-hw.c when the thermal pressure is not 
> updated for offline CPUs. It's similar fix that has been merged
> recently for cpufreq_cooling.c:
> 2ad8ccc17d1e4270cf65a3f2
> 
> The patch 4/5 fixes also qcom-cpufreq-hw.c driver code which did
> the translation from frequency to capacity wrongly when there
> was a boost frequency available and stored in 'policy->cpuinfo.max_freq'.

LGTM. I will apply this in a few days so people get time to Ack/Review
the patches.

-- 
viresh