Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D902C433F5 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 18:25:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 673C461284 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 18:25:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234128AbhKKS21 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Nov 2021 13:28:27 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54146 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234433AbhKKS2P (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Nov 2021 13:28:15 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7281BC061767 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 10:25:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id o8so27525751edc.3 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 10:25:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=txXLZF+9GfwagVnL9c9/R4fXHlgcGjXwIQ9SEznOgw0=; b=DsB69FvhZeAIbA18E5lHyHhIB+6y0QEHISA/MG0eDH6ZxBcMLGUWVQ73YJDeYYAuHw e6V86fgWC1PkbhMVTYclUPfSFPLWwo492vk1iDlCsBGyKY/2zadSes9BDcjIiMh/01rd LPCk0ucKKmeu6HPFTyXRbZ9bD/1Be5x3+UyrvsuuAv+XlPY+sXKphDeW2InKsrnoHSqe XgUh6JVC7DlIInCuCaKz0thozytIvWre7vRcqx25k4CO7zYNJR7ZjncGFTzqMMPWHlEu JQBbd/cULS7+E+9oGsIMEUZw5VX4IeNRzDW9pJqmZgopfUrOgBy6giZ0dNaaCDDd5gG5 MGug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=txXLZF+9GfwagVnL9c9/R4fXHlgcGjXwIQ9SEznOgw0=; b=U8PiLh7chwLmCpyhFdbDDBcPVvNZdKhAIr5nsii17wHDnAox4DL5oapMJ60A68xG21 tOx5NkCyoz/jNH5SKqqwmIPKGtq9dbLDpbOuEVGg68f4aFSiGaNSdlFGtBFIIM3fXF3R zjxoOUW8yvZINzKVi+yJfZhgPPpaGg/16KgKM8tIQICkotGSCwl4AJdDRpMzfqfpO5fK hri/p7tr5KqdvnVp36DfhS1NyC1eCKAJIVg/TizpPfjsd+NGLrNWTCo+/R1uGbJCcSOp 9LmUOL5jPc7UUuvBVESb/pIDbr3DKeoregYLBoK9EUIkm7NbuNzyKZI8K0AE6rD4jGHp 5xDw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533rvf7xUfAhZWdzX4k1Qz+aa3u0SvisXCSc5+gVLdvuPPPIYXb3 4w9HvKzkMNxOOZFOS+ta53soHzhLbNBtNG1v9R6ylg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxFE9orYhB3+TLnpd1AnZFajEuUTnGFTtb8ntq5zjW336ZzFGuMzgIOFqm93IGf+xvcyleIp9lOGq1fKGp/DkU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:280d:: with SMTP id h13mr12768202ede.346.1636655124051; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 10:25:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Mathieu Poirier Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 11:25:12 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] coresight: Use devm_bitmap_zalloc when applicable To: Christophe JAILLET Cc: Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com, mike.leach@linaro.org, leo.yan@linaro.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Christophe, On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 at 12:39, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > > 'drvdata->chs.guaranteed' is a bitmap. So use 'devm_bitmap_kzalloc()' to > simplify code, improve the semantic and avoid some open-coded arithmetic > in allocator arguments. > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET > --- > v1 --> v2: remove the 'guaranteed' variable to be even less verbose > --- > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-stm.c | 10 +++------- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-stm.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-stm.c > index 58062a5a8238..bb14a3a8a921 100644 > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-stm.c > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-stm.c > @@ -856,13 +856,11 @@ static int stm_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id) > { > int ret; > void __iomem *base; > - unsigned long *guaranteed; > struct device *dev = &adev->dev; > struct coresight_platform_data *pdata = NULL; > struct stm_drvdata *drvdata; > struct resource *res = &adev->res; > struct resource ch_res; > - size_t bitmap_size; > struct coresight_desc desc = { 0 }; > > desc.name = coresight_alloc_device_name(&stm_devs, dev); > @@ -904,12 +902,10 @@ static int stm_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id) > else > drvdata->numsp = stm_num_stimulus_port(drvdata); > > - bitmap_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(drvdata->numsp) * sizeof(long); > - > - guaranteed = devm_kzalloc(dev, bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL); > - if (!guaranteed) > + drvdata->chs.guaranteed = devm_bitmap_zalloc(dev, drvdata->numsp, > + GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!drvdata->chs.guaranteed) > return -ENOMEM; > - drvdata->chs.guaranteed = guaranteed; I will pick up this patch when -rc1 gets released. Thanks, Mathieu > > spin_lock_init(&drvdata->spinlock); > > -- > 2.30.2 >