Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161275AbXAHXV3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:21:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161271AbXAHXV3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:21:29 -0500 Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:3698 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1161275AbXAHXV2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:21:28 -0500 Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 00:21:31 +0100 From: Adrian Bunk To: Andi Kleen Cc: discuss@x86-64.org, "Eric W. Biederman" , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Yinghai Lu , Linus Torvalds , mingo@redhat.com, Tobias Diedrich Subject: Re: [discuss] [PATCH 4/4] x86_64 ioapic: Improve the heuristics for when check_timer fails. Message-ID: <20070108232131.GA25007@stusta.de> References: <5986589C150B2F49A46483AC44C7BCA490733F@ssvlexmb2.amd.com> <20070108223355.GI6167@stusta.de> <200701090014.42144.ak@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200701090014.42144.ak@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1473 Lines: 44 On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 12:14:41AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > We just got a completely different bug reported that was confirmed to be > > caused by Andi's patch: > > AMD64/ATI : timer is running twice as fast as it should [1] > > I have such a machine that showed this problem and when I wrote the patch I > tested it on it (and on a couple of others of course). No twice as fast on > my testing. > > In fact there are two types of ATI machines: ones that have a BIOS workaround > for the original Linux issue and ones that don't. Keeping both > happy is not easy. > > So I'm somewhat dubious on that. Where is that report? Follow the link [1] in my email (and the bug is already assigned to you). > > My whole point is that for 2.6.20, we can live with simply reverting > > Andi's commit. > > I agree. It's more problematical than I expected. Reverting is > the best option right now. > > -Andi cu Adrian [1] http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7789 -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/