Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A354AC433F5 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 14:29:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851AD60F39 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 14:29:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235315AbhKLOcn (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Nov 2021 09:32:43 -0500 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.154.123]:55353 "EHLO esa.microchip.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235145AbhKLOck (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Nov 2021 09:32:40 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1636727390; x=1668263390; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QIlW9DbBMZJ7+M6XfWg1v8S4XbzujCKrn+C7a3HwsDQ=; b=l+ToTLLqCnDdoArPjyqsDL4lsYyequTKJJ89+Re5rWMs23xCvQ/66Zmz ps1SODbKKOqJuDTPNXqVviPrdpNT0HSZ836gIklMw+79TtXE1m1Fkt5qh 4KfHjUdR761sI4gi/jV1OGw7R91zgtUl+vEqG35fTQGcSikIjyB41+mDU y6LX5CQSW8xjkBm5PMvrxz6/z+C+UU0nP+q72BHN4vOrihLX5FbQ8rlBN DxjCRaJwCoXGUdyaV8NMQPj2v6SkBecJ4DfPpgI0KaXCwumXKK/8s7ofH QOZcyxOPqNvRtkOO5JqryOWxE2WnPtjHK5vD1fUhejfoZJVmrBA9Tqeyc g==; IronPort-SDR: amcE6qChjDHJVsWno9I8haaxsWfs4Nq3Zln7Jonw8COAxN7TF5CDs+QM5utbGdQlyT476q15YP p9Ixc05GzgVNahRSlt4s0pRIQkuyLs/xvsz/k8YDqs1eWKhhBXiWkjzexc0nlL2oG44qllqSbk rdY/+WsBZqOkMoadZk1x2oIKpxZGfbEtf6Z++kd0q5v0aOdw9Si+cjpHJ1zQvmWGTOxoRZUHUa NJxE5SO7gECXASlLHR5i361G0JLL5x+FhjxBvBsFzFn1QT/bgzdCRAEbUupHCwfDZ6yeGLchZo qITu8T0j/YyFANU3OxQxqihH X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.87,229,1631602800"; d="scan'208";a="136388105" Received: from smtpout.microchip.com (HELO email.microchip.com) ([198.175.253.82]) by esa4.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 12 Nov 2021 07:29:49 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex01.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.143) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.14; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 07:29:49 -0700 Received: from ROB-ULT-M18282.microchip.com (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex01.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2176.14 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 07:29:37 -0700 From: Eugen Hristev To: CC: , , , , , , , Eugen Hristev Subject: [PATCH v2 18/25] media: atmel: atmel-sama5d2-isc: fix wrong mask in YUYV format check Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 16:25:02 +0200 Message-ID: <20211112142509.2230884-19-eugen.hristev@microchip.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20211112142509.2230884-1-eugen.hristev@microchip.com> References: <20211112142509.2230884-1-eugen.hristev@microchip.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org While this does not happen in production, this check should be done versus the mask, as checking with the YCYC value may not include some bits that may be set. Is it correct and safe to check the whole mask. Fixes: 123aaf816b95 ("media: atmel: atmel-sama5d2-isc: fix YUYV format") Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev --- drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-sama5d2-isc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-sama5d2-isc.c b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-sama5d2-isc.c index a3e4c32a66c4..a8d4ba60d3ac 100644 --- a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-sama5d2-isc.c +++ b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-sama5d2-isc.c @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static void isc_sama5d2_config_rlp(struct isc_device *isc) * Thus, if the YCYC mode is selected, replace it with the * sama5d2-compliant mode which is YYCC . */ - if ((rlp_mode & ISC_RLP_CFG_MODE_YCYC) == ISC_RLP_CFG_MODE_YCYC) { + if ((rlp_mode & ISC_RLP_CFG_MODE_MASK) == ISC_RLP_CFG_MODE_YCYC) { rlp_mode &= ~ISC_RLP_CFG_MODE_MASK; rlp_mode |= ISC_RLP_CFG_MODE_YYCC; } -- 2.25.1