Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750948AbXAIDH4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jan 2007 22:07:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750950AbXAIDH4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jan 2007 22:07:56 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:49846 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750912AbXAIDH4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jan 2007 22:07:56 -0500 Subject: Re: mprotect abuse in slim From: Arjan van de Ven To: Mimi Zohar Cc: Christoph Hellwig , akpm@osdl.org, kjhall@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, safford@watson.ibm.com In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Intel International BV Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:07:25 -0800 Message-Id: <1168312045.3180.140.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2.1 (2.8.2.1-2.fc6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 867 Lines: 23 > Starting with the fdtable, would it help if we move the > fdtable tweaking out of slim itself and into helpers? Or > can you recommend another way to implement this functionality. Hi, maybe this is a silly question, but do you revoke not only the current fd entries, but also the ones that are pending in UNIX domain sockets and that are already being sent to the process? If not.. then you might as well not bother ;) Greetings, Arjan van de Ven -- if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/