Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F71FC433F5 for ; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 21:35:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A4C60E9B for ; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 21:35:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236106AbhKMViZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Nov 2021 16:38:25 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55910 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234306AbhKMViW (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Nov 2021 16:38:22 -0500 Received: from mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34D61C061766 for ; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 13:35:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com with SMTP id y3so34125109ybf.2 for ; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 13:35:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mSXJ3uMUoVuuhGKC/oVSm8bEZNFwZL8IbH9GMbqinz8=; b=dkaTRJTRIi4ZifpY9ICa/j7nErEweW4HufoKRtFVlWbkDqfE4ttOCtu7D5UAdvMdgM PWs9pViYlrbvAtah2pdcHABvOMfIs0sZlVgdDFdbzbzPz2qxb5Zc5BAnRhtc2vU8s2u4 f96KLpJKEmp/G/mmEkgTXD+UJ8eZ7EO9ENCU8FuPCqr0uhYFEf59rUGKutg4J8bXgU0V fkW4Tdf4cC2QgTk941IQoGtpRpl2n+7AXMqSRU1jm6y8Or5cHZ+XM4AK6Y9OW6xlu57r 4yTL12Ous6bHQraMdkCLQTtwlIRAY7mxzuOlGD00jNimEmG7l3bwEIUnk1bDoAA8R86T xFmw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mSXJ3uMUoVuuhGKC/oVSm8bEZNFwZL8IbH9GMbqinz8=; b=oBkbHi8hLvFwQFzcujD4NPQdUENWuyMMW4USnHhmdS/PCcEs638EjAKK+AsWmDvguL dwoGdGoiGxExCl05Nnl9CoP1Vk63dnO7+3eYS66neKs8odd9h2mHgDbhAZ3+dpR3Hsa+ e1e2AfGsqV5ISLo6oMNOcrSbSRRPNPc/8Gn4XYajFw9WT9ARPZPOMSGETd05hqAlGwMX gqNy6Sf7hSCT68e74fEmQLOLyWcvNYlvkU4iZ41IBIZrFUT1sKBWiDeaAFHChHse8DAc ADny8CQLEzpD65bbyPVQidRZ40JPFCCaNuJK+0NtFUW1piTj5CR/H9Bav0FrgkPt1EI/ RNmg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530XihHKa3GFvpE0b1FKPMUIelpL8dCLucH9yDPO9iPfw4s0EP7v X74gJyLtFD3/2tgLKV7/ohDAdRkDHrfS1hohrnvEiO+2PuM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxiyniWoK2HoBAw4yOk/7IK6gECxvBOuNXSV39rmBpeaxcPXsgNhCEjQ1hAuKN5hNQecWTsHtNVolyHlBLYX3w= X-Received: by 2002:a25:488:: with SMTP id 130mr27073299ybe.346.1636839329289; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 13:35:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Sudip Mukherjee Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2021 21:34:53 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: regression with mainline kernel To: Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-kernel , Gurchetan Singh , Nicholas Verne , Gerd Hoffmann , dri-devel , "open list:VIRTIO GPU DRIVER" , Daniel Vetter Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Linus, On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 5:07 PM Linus Torvalds wrote: > > [ Hmm. This email was marked as spam for me. I see no obvious reason > for it being marked as spam, but it happens.. ] > > On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 12:52 PM Sudip Mukherjee > wrote: > > > > # first bad commit: [cd7f5ca33585918febe5e2f6dc090a21cfa775b0] > > drm/virtio: implement context init: add virtio_gpu_fence_event > > Hmm. Judging from your automated screenshots, the login never appears. > > > HOWEVER - it has had a fix for a NULL pointer dereference in the > meantime - can you check whether the current top of tree happens to > work for you? Maybe your problem isn't due to "that commit does > unnatural things", but simply due to the bug fixed in d89c0c8322ec > ("drm/virtio: Fix NULL dereference error in virtio_gpu_poll"). > > And if it's still broken with that commit, I'll happily revert it and > people need to go back to the drawing board. I sent another mail yesterday which is now at https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CADVatmOOzCxAgLhCu1tTz=44sgRDXds5-oMZ3V0w4f5kLCLKrw@mail.gmail.com/ I will just pase that here for you. Last night's test on 66f4beaa6c1d worked fine. So I guess this has now been fixed. I have not done a bisect to see what has fixed it, but looking at the log I think it will be that NULL pointer fix. -- Regards Sudip