From:   Jason Wang <wangborong@cdjrlc.com>
To:     catalin.marinas@arm.com
Cc:     maz@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com,
        alexandru.elisei@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Wang <wangborong@cdjrlc.com>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: remove unneeded comparison
Date:   Sun, 14 Nov 2021 14:40:26 +0800
Message-Id: <20211114064026.277024-1-wangborong@cdjrlc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Feedback-ID: bizesmtp:cdjrlc.com:qybgspam:qybgspam1
Precedence: bulk

The unsigned expression compared with zero `target < 0' is
unneeded and its result is always false. we can also check the
target's value returned from `kvm_target_cpu' is one of the
KVM_* macros, and these macros are defined greater than or equal
to 0.
Therefore, the comparison code block:
    if (target < 0)
        return -ENODEV;
is unneeded. We can safely remove it.

Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <wangborong@cdjrlc.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
index 5ce26bedf23c..1605cb71dd52 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
@@ -873,9 +873,6 @@ int kvm_vcpu_preferred_target(struct kvm_vcpu_init *init)
 {
 	u32 target = kvm_target_cpu();
 
-	if (target < 0)
-		return -ENODEV;
-
 	memset(init, 0, sizeof(*init));
 
 	/*
-- 
2.33.0