Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88BA3C433EF for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 21:57:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4FD60F44 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 21:57:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235530AbhKNV7y (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Nov 2021 16:59:54 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60136 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231469AbhKNV7t (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Nov 2021 16:59:49 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com (mail-ed1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42762C061766 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 13:56:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id g14so63016939edz.2 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 13:56:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vanguardiasur-com-ar.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=z+a45scJUghbWle9ZBsDg+s+2wzuH5GEQRWeFAD8t7E=; b=AKBJYmPfyiaYmwd7oyncnL6zw9NtPWAJSbT7wJ9CoM5XRX4y7lYR4azZmAWJhnkbx3 wApEFEVRRFjCRlk8LcnF6jhjQwm5wv7r4B6Skyc7KmZmOOftQeLeqyS9W4PEM5aCIXOK 3C2t8LKXJCZlA74FYaRzy+O2yuqZGrD9mvi+IO33lc7L6Yucfzu+gveGnyIDEh2HehQo GXFDuQDrEVz3+SlIQXV7z/Scjb381zZkmaPcGnIu7xzfs3l25xVRGofL7jjsWciVrfFx LQ7c+cenNltzXc/rnPZhVahuvpT8J2ioVmkhvGdpu+lB9nG1RnYh946IZT2OyC/m7P+O T77w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=z+a45scJUghbWle9ZBsDg+s+2wzuH5GEQRWeFAD8t7E=; b=1OYJFqOfu18fHIsJU/DsbVWB1NDvRjBBj7sR797pzNV9KYGKbRE6AeABfnEQlUrMqj fWxlNAfGesU+zzuTEt2+mStAkoCtIL7+/6uq+AvEIrN7RD5EouIXiUAIW4Rq2LwFx04/ VGrMl90IHvUqxUa3/7oG6p55HQYSPFLfKNtCx6kJVdJ8vLgf8JK1Mak+ugK0fItCUSrs YNGpgf64+6EUsy0afjJ5S6SZkNgsycOzxENJErevsVrBeMVfqeE5Gc1V/jrCLNJRHQQu hNYoRqTSSbgtrRUDsogWdeYdsGPpTI6HpuVp4o69TlWwLEhrxL78wQB6z8qtpn0nWkUE sEyA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5302m3UMYqACCahl20qzqGkOUGtj656LD9p6VIBQv6j+bN10HUqU ld46c/l3mdiC3lVHxvcKCMBC4rttJ1UNEiRHDsTEpg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyomQczgvwHG7w6id4jh3N0ebh0Ihr1LveJ55TvN/g341+OWtesIcRAQSmVB1tvezeAr3cMSOUbMM62omekLG0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:190d:: with SMTP id e13mr47552746edz.339.1636927009693; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 13:56:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211111041500.17363-1-yunfei.dong@mediatek.com> <20211111041500.17363-16-yunfei.dong@mediatek.com> In-Reply-To: <20211111041500.17363-16-yunfei.dong@mediatek.com> From: Ezequiel Garcia Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 18:56:37 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v10, 15/19] dt-bindings: media: mtk-vcodec: Adds decoder dt-bindings for mt8192 To: Yunfei Dong Cc: Alexandre Courbot , Hans Verkuil , Tzung-Bi Shih , Tiffany Lin , Andrew-CT Chen , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Rob Herring , Matthias Brugger , Tomasz Figa , Irui Wang , Benjamin Gaignard , srv_heupstream , devicetree , Linux Kernel Mailing List , dri-devel , Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group , "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" , Hsin-Yi Wang , Fritz Koenig , Dafna Hirschfeld , linux-arm-kernel , linux-media Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Yunfei, On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 at 01:15, Yunfei Dong wrote: > > Adds decoder dt-bindings for mt8192. > > Signed-off-by: Yunfei Dong > --- > .../media/mediatek,vcodec-subdev-decoder.yaml | 261 ++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 261 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek,vcodec-subdev-decoder.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek,vcodec-subdev-decoder.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek,vcodec-subdev-decoder.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..1886fae6e39d > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek,vcodec-subdev-decoder.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,261 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > + > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/media/mediatek,vcodec-subdev-decoder.yaml#" > +$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#" > + > +title: Mediatek Video Decode Accelerator With Multi Hardware > + > +maintainers: > + - Yunfei Dong > + > +description: | > + Mediatek Video Decode is the video decode hardware present in Mediatek > + SoCs which supports high resolution decoding functionalities. Required > + main and subdev device node. > + > + About the Decoder Hardware Block Diagram, please check below: > + > + +---------------------------------+------------------------------------+ > + | | | > + | input -> lat HW -> lat buffer --|--> lat buffer -> core HW -> output | To be completely honest, I can't really understand what is the meaning of the blocks with input -> lat hw -> lat buffer, and how this means lat- and core- are children of some parent. > + | || | || | > + +------------||-------------------+---------------------||-------------+ > + || lat thread | core thread || > + -------------||-----------------------------------------||---------------- > + || || > + \/ <----------------HW index-------------->\/ > + +------------------------------------------------------+ > + | enable/disable | > + | clk power irq iommu port | > + | (lat/lat soc/core0/core1) | > + +------------------------------------------------------+ > + > + As above, mean in main device, mean in subdev device. The information > + of each hardware will be stored in subdev device. There are two workqueues in main device: > + lat and core. Enable/disable the lat clk/power/irq when lat need to work through hardware > + index, core is the same. > + > + Normally the smi common may not the same for each hardware, can't combine all hardware in > + one node, or leading to iommu fault when access dram data. > + To what extent the lat- and core- devices are really "children" or "subdevices" of the video-codec@16000000 device? I.e. what resources do they share? What are the details of their bus topology? > + > +examples: > + - | > + #include > + #include > + #include > + #include > + #include > + > + video-codec@16000000 { > + compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-vcodec-dec"; > + reg = <0x16000000 0x1000>; /* VDEC_SYS */ > + mediatek,scp = <&scp>; > + iommus = <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_MC_EXT>; > + dma-ranges = <0x1 0x0 0x0 0x40000000 0x0 0xfff00000>; > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <1>; > + ranges; > + vcodec-lat@16010000 { > + compatible = "mediatek,mtk-vcodec-lat"; > + reg = <0x16010000 0x800>; > + interrupts = ; > + iommus = <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L5_VDEC_LAT0_VLD_EXT>, > + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L5_VDEC_LAT0_VLD2_EXT>, > + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L5_VDEC_LAT0_AVC_MV_EXT>, > + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L5_VDEC_LAT0_PRED_RD_EXT>, > + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L5_VDEC_LAT0_TILE_EXT>, > + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L5_VDEC_LAT0_WDMA_EXT>, > + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L5_VDEC_LAT0_RG_CTRL_DMA_EXT>, > + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L5_VDEC_UFO_ENC_EXT>; > + clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_VDEC_SEL>, > + <&vdecsys_soc CLK_VDEC_SOC_VDEC>, > + <&vdecsys_soc CLK_VDEC_SOC_LAT>, > + <&vdecsys_soc CLK_VDEC_SOC_LARB1>, > + <&topckgen CLK_TOP_MAINPLL_D4>; > + clock-names = "sel", "soc-vdec", "soc-lat", "vdec", "top"; > + assigned-clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_VDEC_SEL>; > + assigned-clock-parents = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_MAINPLL_D4>; > + power-domains = <&spm MT8192_POWER_DOMAIN_VDEC>; > + }; > + > + vcodec-core@16025000 { > + compatible = "mediatek,mtk-vcodec-core"; > + reg = <0x16025000 0x1000>; The children address space might need some thinking. In other words, video-codec@16000000 { vcodec-lat@16010000 { } vcodec-core@16025000 { } } Your proposal has vcodec-lat as children of video-codec, but its address space are really on the same level, instead of children being contained in the parent address space: video-codec@16000000 { vcodec-lat@10000 { } vcodec-core@25000 { } } I think this last tree makes more sense from a device-tree point of view. The ranges property allows you to put the right translation information, so the device driver itself will get the correct address 0x16000000 + 0x25000. You might find that the ranges property is tricky to understand at first. Thanks, Ezequiel > + interrupts = ; > + iommus = <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_MC_EXT>, > + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_UFO_EXT>, > + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_PP_EXT>, > + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_PRED_RD_EXT>, > + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_PRED_WR_EXT>, > + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_PPWRAP_EXT>, > + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_TILE_EXT>, > + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_VLD_EXT>, > + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_VLD2_EXT>, > + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_AVC_MV_EXT>, > + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_RG_CTRL_DMA_EXT>; > + clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_VDEC_SEL>, > + <&vdecsys CLK_VDEC_VDEC>, > + <&vdecsys CLK_VDEC_LAT>, > + <&vdecsys CLK_VDEC_LARB1>, > + <&topckgen CLK_TOP_MAINPLL_D4>; > + clock-names = "sel", "soc-vdec", "soc-lat", "vdec", "top"; > + assigned-clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_VDEC_SEL>; > + assigned-clock-parents = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_MAINPLL_D4>; > + power-domains = <&spm MT8192_POWER_DOMAIN_VDEC2>; > + }; > + }; > -- > 2.25.1 >