Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE4BC433F5 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 10:44:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D48630EF for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 10:44:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237360AbhKOKrB (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Nov 2021 05:47:01 -0500 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de ([195.135.220.29]:45310 "EHLO smtp-out2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237639AbhKOKqz (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Nov 2021 05:46:55 -0500 Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FBF91FD65; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 10:43:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1636973039; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=833FoBJroEwcf8aYlUSW0H0gnUbGPYrGy9snOMHf4J8=; b=fPpzRQr+zYuM8VmbNGhoOhu7lL01rGVkgWJH/kp8xewBxwsOinG+OEFiKiU9p9qhsCxaGe Uw5uNYTSEL0vgzoJKmA6IE358CPonxsdvj27ho6rCSjkrPZhk56FKZpYm3BoI9cSHGtY8D IMZdj59SHXmFkuufqOvj82KeAoEPRDc= Received: from suse.cz (mhocko.udp.ovpn2.prg.suse.de [10.100.201.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 588C6A3B83; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 10:43:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 11:43:57 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: Claudio Imbrenda Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, thuth@redhat.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, ultrachin@163.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz, brookxu.cn@gmail.com, xiaoggchen@tencent.com, linuszeng@tencent.com, yihuilu@tencent.com, daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com, axboe@kernel.dk, legion@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, aarcange@redhat.com, christian@brauner.io, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [RFC v1 2/4] kernel/fork.c: implement new process_mmput_async syscall Message-ID: References: <20211111095008.264412-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> <20211111095008.264412-4-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> <874k8ixzx0.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <20211112103439.441b4c12@p-imbrenda> <87v90xv2uu.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <20211112175309.7e0fe52a@p-imbrenda> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211112175309.7e0fe52a@p-imbrenda> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri 12-11-21 17:53:09, Claudio Imbrenda wrote: [...] > Of course, but this also means that it's not possible to stop the OOM > killer while the teardown is in progress, Blocking the OOM killer and depend on the userspace to make a forward progress is not acceptable solution. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs