Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:50:07 +0000
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make BH_Unwritten a first class bufferhead flag
Message-ID: <20070109105007.GA22531@infradead.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20070108224932.GZ33919298@melbourne.sgi.com> <20070108225402.GA24787@infradead.org> <20070108235745.GD33919298@melbourne.sgi.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070108235745.GD33919298@melbourne.sgi.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 790
Lines: 17

On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 10:57:45AM +1100, David Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 10:54:02PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > this doesn't look like a full first class flag to me yet.  Don't
> > we need to check for buffer_unwritten in the places we're checking
> > for buffer_delay so we can stop setting buffer_delay for unwritten
> > buffers?
> 
> That would be __block_prepare_write() and block_truncate_page()?
> I can't see anywhere else in the code where buffer_delay is used
> outside XFS....

Yes, I think it's just those two.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/