Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFDB1C433EF for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 14:10:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75FA61C4F for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 14:10:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232102AbhKOONm (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Nov 2021 09:13:42 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:55770 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232060AbhKOOM0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Nov 2021 09:12:26 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE136D; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 06:09:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com (FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.26.128]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD2813F766; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 06:09:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 14:09:27 +0000 From: Mark Rutland To: Valentin Schneider Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, dvyukov@google.com, peterz@infradead.org, quic_qiancai@quicinc.com, will@kernel.org, woodylin@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reset task stack state in bringup_cpu() Message-ID: References: <20211115113310.35693-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> <87pmr1r4vl.mognet@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87pmr1r4vl.mognet@arm.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 12:16:14PM +0000, Valentin Schneider wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > Thanks for tackling this and glueing the pieces back together. LGTM, though > I couldn't stop myself from playing changelog police - I also have a > question/comment wrt the BP. I'll go fix the various typos for v2; replies to the more substantial comments below. > On 15/11/21 11:33, Mark Rutland wrote: > > To hot unplug a CPU, the idle task on that CPU calls a few layers of C > > code before finally leaving the kernel. When KASAN is in use, poisoned > > shadow is left around for each of the active stack frames, and when > > shadow call stacks are in use. When shadow call stacks are in use the > > task's SCS SP is left pointing at an arbitrary point within the task's > > shadow call stack. > > Fix both of these consistently and more robustly by resetting the SCS SP > > and KASAN shadow immediately before we online a CPU. > Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider Thanks! > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c > > index 3c9b0fda64ac..76f9deeaa942 100644 > > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c > > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c > > @@ -8619,9 +8619,6 @@ void __init init_idle(struct task_struct *idle, int cpu) > > idle->flags |= PF_IDLE | PF_KTHREAD | PF_NO_SETAFFINITY; > > kthread_set_per_cpu(idle, cpu); > > > > - scs_task_reset(idle); > > - kasan_unpoison_task_stack(idle); > > - > > So those are no longer invoked for the BP during bootup (via sched_init()); > that looks OK for KASAN per: > > e1b77c92981a ("sched/kasan: remove stale KASAN poison after hotplug") > > I didn't find any explicit commit for SCS but from the looks of > arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h we seem to be initializing things > correctly, so IIUC the removed hunk wasn't actually necessary for the BP's > first boot. Correct. For the init task: * The KASAN shadow starts out empty, and there's no poison to remove. * The saved SCS SP is initialized statically as part of INIT_THREAD_INFO(), via INIT_SCS(). ... so that requires no special care. For every task created thereafter (including idle threads): * dup_task_struct() allocates the new task's stack via alloc_thread_stack_node(), which either explicitly removes KASAN poison from the shadow of a cached stack, or acquires a stack via __vmalloc_node_range(), whose shadow starts out empty. * dup_task_struct() calls scs_prepare() which allocates the task's shadow stack and initializes the SCS SP for the task. The idle threads get created via fork_idle(), which calls copy_process() (and therefore dup_task_struct) to allocate the idle thread, then calls init_idle() on the result. Thanks Mark.