Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932156AbXAIPe2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:34:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932157AbXAIPe2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:34:28 -0500 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.233]:43818 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932156AbXAIPe1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:34:27 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=CVM9qB71ugFCgpO7BfSLRXI2VJrnZFAa4zEn7/sTsNTFwM+/tKFErBMfU6GQjkyJXl3av8cbjrnCKfMMGsYPRKXnvmLepXmYcU+3C/Djxo4Aq4bi/+E3BVbYe09GwP8ujbEo4dpytDpXoympR0FtTxBfG+ESDgKLb/q2GDeaWRY= Message-ID: <8355959a0701090733l74d03792q16b3022d949c7ae1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:03:58 +0530 From: Akula2 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Jumping into Kernel development: About -rc kernels... MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1745 Lines: 47 Hello All, This question might sound dumb for many, and to some annoying too ;-) Am enterting into -rc Kernel (testing & analysis) & involvement with the kernel (contributing to patches). I have this doubt. I did refer to applying-patches in the kernel documentation, this is what I got:- > These are the base stable releases released by Linus. The highest numbered > release is the most recent. > If regressions or other serious flaws are found, then a -stable fix patch > will be released (see below) on top of this base. Once a new 2.6.x base > kernel is released, a patch is made available that is a delta between the > previous 2.6.x kernel and the new one. > To apply a patch moving from 2.6.11 to 2.6.12, you'd do the following (note > that such patches do *NOT* apply on top of 2.6.x.y kernels but on top of the > base 2.6.x kernel -- if you need to move from 2.6.x.y to 2.6.x+1 you need to > first revert the 2.6.x.y patch). I did understand till here. Should I start compile/test/debug one-after-one in this fashion:- 2.6.19 source + patch-2.6.20-rc1 2.6.19 source + patch-2.6.20-rc2 2.6.19 source + patch-2.6.20-rc3 2.6.19 source + patch-2.6.20-rc4 OR Pick the latest release number? Note: Am working for different requirements in the Labs with Linux (Telecom/Embedded). This activity starting as an independant activity in my home/sometimes in Labs. So, I wanted to jump into kernel development (mainly as compile/test/debug/patch). Hope I get enough encouragement ;-) ~Akula2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/