Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932476AbXAIWnK (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:43:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932479AbXAIWnJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:43:09 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51053 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932476AbXAIWnI (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:43:08 -0500 From: Andi Kleen To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] x86_64: re-add a newline to RESTORE_CONTEXT Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:43:00 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Adrian Bunk , discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Steven M. Christey" References: <20070109025516.GC25007@stusta.de> <200701091201.21146.ak@suse.de> <20070109140424.5f96de69.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20070109140424.5f96de69.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701092343.01112.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 596 Lines: 20 > > But the patch is a bugfix. Without it, you cannot do > > RESTORE_CONTEXT \ > .globl ... \ > > Was the addition of this restriction to RESTORE_CONTEXT deliberate, or > mistaken? RESTORE_CONTEXT is a private macro and I don't see why we should support out of tree usages for that. As long as it works as it is in the tree it is fine. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/