Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA5DC433F5 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 00:10:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886A36323F for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 00:10:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1354362AbhKPANC (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Nov 2021 19:13:02 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]:37569 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232443AbhKOVbF (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Nov 2021 16:31:05 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1637011689; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=eB9LIJ8wftWZtVC2tmoTuif+x3rpeL1vcMWkA0vO7Oo=; b=ixnw1mcTr19CdHQ0ch6Echv3BASAZnVEpZz0YjCPK9eKtIejvUoakitYWPPQVES4nM6EBK lk3l1ex7YCZJpwRdstvJlmwg2ksU5s+O7cmnjibbHb+BPc0ydoK8s5MB0jLOLs5g8Ez81s hrniOiO5d6CQB15ETzGKuLWEN0nELrU= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-193-2Dn2_3U9N7eoU0qXDNUoVQ-1; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 16:28:06 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 2Dn2_3U9N7eoU0qXDNUoVQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9300D87D545; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:28:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.22.33.148] (unknown [10.22.33.148]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0769D10016FC; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:27:57 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1426905d-f93a-7500-177b-a8e0fae467ab@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 16:27:57 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/6] cgroup/cpuset: Update description of cpuset.cpus.partition in cgroup-v2.rst Content-Language: en-US To: Tejun Heo , =?UTF-8?Q?Michal_Koutn=c3=bd?= Cc: Zefan Li , Johannes Weiner , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Roman Gushchin , Phil Auld , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Frederic Weisbecker , Marcelo Tosatti References: <20211018143619.205065-1-longman@redhat.com> <20211018143619.205065-6-longman@redhat.com> <20211115193122.GA16798@blackbody.suse.cz> From: Waiman Long In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/15/21 15:11, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 08:31:22PM +0100, Michal Koutný wrote: >> Now to the constraints and partition setups. I think it's useful to have >> a model with which the implementation can be compared with. >> I tried to condense some "simple rules" from the descriptions you posted >> in v8 plus your response to my remarks in v7 [2]. These should only be >> the "validity conditions", not "transition conditions". > FWIW, my opinion is pretty much in line with Michal's in this regard. Other > than that, everything looks pretty good to me. Yes, I am going to streamline the documentation as suggested to make it easier to understand. Coding-wise, do you have other changes you want me to make? Thanks, Longman