Date:   Tue, 16 Nov 2021 06:55:05 +0800
From:   Calvin Zhang <calvinzhang.cool@gmail.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc:     Calvin Zhang <calvinzhang.cool@gmail.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] of: make MAX_RESERVED_REGIONS configurable
Message-ID: <YZLlSd9vPXpQFz5b@debian>
References: <20211115073240.3476043-1-calvinzhang.cool@gmail.com>
 <CAL_JsqLtG4m6hqKc0TJs+e8ZBRZSGgOAoumnvg7u_D46i5D_AA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqLtG4m6hqKc0TJs+e8ZBRZSGgOAoumnvg7u_D46i5D_AA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 08:05:45AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 1:33 AM Calvin Zhang <calvinzhang.cool@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> MAX_RESERVED_REGIONS has changed several times. Max reserved regions
>> count grows bigger as more SOC subsystems require reserved regions.
>>
>> Add a Kconfig for it so that when properly configured, the static
>> reserved_mem array consumes less memory on systems with few reserved
>> regions.
>
>Please read prior discussions:
>
>https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=of+MAX_RESERVED_REGIONS
>
>And these 2 in particular:
>
>https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAL_JsqJQcWsguwfehAoaRf4o-2VqXxSzKzTqg7s4+N1bp=6V5Q@mail.gmail.com/
>https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAL_JsqLGvUYQmCGXLgSO+6kFj2i87dpaTbMGbyu5oMt=eeu35A@mail.gmail.com/
>
OK. I will try to make the array dynamic.

Thanks,
Calvin