Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E55C433EF for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 02:09:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B626361406 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 02:09:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240822AbhKPCL4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:11:56 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:40418 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239131AbhKOR5e (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Nov 2021 12:57:34 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D9C460EB4; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 17:34:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1636997680; bh=20uB+79fYR4hOOUMGFIhnwApFAW0J6rBVImb+Ip4T7A=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=KQIDp2Th6uKVXkk/4K1d7mMNBA0zOrZohJpz3TXPxn2LWkv0XVUrA3okeP0BLEj0c SioN1yuBUGbMPkfjpvcFK8LRtsGK8mD4LRThrph1FHz9tr9okr2Jt2Oxl1HX1nV5yK nB0UErNNfjTFeNBquOLtM4dyusqnrP+cC6/fd1xE= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa , Andrii Nakryiko , John Fastabend , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.10 236/575] selftests/bpf: Fix perf_buffer test on system with offline cpus Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 17:59:21 +0100 Message-Id: <20211115165351.895493766@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.33.1 In-Reply-To: <20211115165343.579890274@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20211115165343.579890274@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Jiri Olsa [ Upstream commit d4121376ac7a9c81a696d7558789b2f29ef3574e ] The perf_buffer fails on system with offline cpus: # test_progs -t perf_buffer test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_on_cpus 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:attach_kprobe 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buf__new 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:epoll_fd 0 nsec skipping offline CPU #24 skipping offline CPU #25 skipping offline CPU #26 skipping offline CPU #27 skipping offline CPU #28 skipping offline CPU #29 skipping offline CPU #30 skipping offline CPU #31 test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buffer__poll 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:PASS:seen_cpu_cnt 0 nsec test_perf_buffer:FAIL:buf_cnt got 24, expected 32 Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED Changing the test to check online cpus instead of possible. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Acked-by: John Fastabend Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211021114132.8196-2-jolsa@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c index ca9f0895ec84e..8d75475408f57 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c @@ -107,8 +107,8 @@ void test_perf_buffer(void) "expect %d, seen %d\n", nr_on_cpus, CPU_COUNT(&cpu_seen))) goto out_free_pb; - if (CHECK(perf_buffer__buffer_cnt(pb) != nr_cpus, "buf_cnt", - "got %zu, expected %d\n", perf_buffer__buffer_cnt(pb), nr_cpus)) + if (CHECK(perf_buffer__buffer_cnt(pb) != nr_on_cpus, "buf_cnt", + "got %zu, expected %d\n", perf_buffer__buffer_cnt(pb), nr_on_cpus)) goto out_close; for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; i++) { -- 2.33.0