Message-ID: <43528a0b-678c-f1c1-c9af-ad8ea324cb85@kali.org>
Date:   Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:00:40 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: freq_table: Initialize cpuinfo.max_freq to
 correct max frequency.
Content-Language: en-US
From:   Steev Klimaszewski <steev@kali.org>
To:     Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org>, rafael@kernel.org,
        viresh.kumar@linaro.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org
Cc:     linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
References: <20211115195011.52999-1-thara.gopinath@linaro.org>
 <5ae2c644-4743-c62c-b17c-96945a0e6a01@kali.org>
In-Reply-To: <5ae2c644-4743-c62c-b17c-96945a0e6a01@kali.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk


On 11/15/21 7:23 PM, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> Hi Thara,
> <snip>
>
> And it doesn't go up, I even tried adding a sleep of 1 second between 
> the echo 1/0/1 lines and while 2956800 goes up to 28 (but never uses 
> it) it seems like, unless I do it manually once I've logged in, which 
> I'm assuming is a lot slower than waiting 1 second between them, it's 
> not quite giving us 2956800 "easily".
>
> If the email wasn't clear, please let me know! I tried to explain as 
> best I could what I am seeing here.
>
> -- steev
>
So after more testing... *sometimes* it works, with the jiggle, but not 
always.  I'm really not sure why though, so if there's any guidance, I'm 
all for it!

-- steev