Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E4CC433F5 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 08:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8DB263217 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 08:23:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231939AbhKPI03 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2021 03:26:29 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40088 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231859AbhKPI02 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2021 03:26:28 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x62b.google.com (mail-pl1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A09FEC061570; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 00:23:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id u11so16792246plf.3; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 00:23:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kSjQ9jafB/VFi3/bAW7yuqbaBiErG/FKqUEAhVEpKXs=; b=mVBGUbZmJMF5+AdErkQ+7iNd03BI+h46tIEJa6NYkfIyWQOPqPQU+3SXHQbmkS9o4u HtXtnDc9kOP7047dD/s6LsZ2THQlVSSqs0gyHMOA5GBZzFsD7d0usv0uFenZITUNdt4D mc6HLm6gQKevuriAjVeC2XxYOOyoswjmGy+e2G/7jD1ZGfsp5O96u4ACQnAO1Rhy1ybg b0i8iIm3kGhPGyn4VOZ5V/oDoJ2yAMuSb2J/ic8sf1xPivFhYHb8/+y3hyaaNUPPJm3d A6c9cKt8HbQnbiGrMsKHGFF3fDWDXh67QjwyzLysJTwMTBLdBhL89IwvZI26qsM580S8 6sNw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kSjQ9jafB/VFi3/bAW7yuqbaBiErG/FKqUEAhVEpKXs=; b=Y5LuIw1BxgL0hJH19KyDc3olnPYkgW2TftXIyY2Cb8KGfC606DFyq8MbC9/w1+DP8Y /T56kzWPeHFANDHgIfTK4spMfbKDRkRzzTnp/Xst/eTDfvX4bwzgL8+c7391QELUvGeZ WSDCnEIr3UkyyzYcHV+BbBtGbdk4LUdM+jsI1AaGI9tadXVYJDRLTSYVyCy62olZKWkT Tv+vlkPLWdFkJbdt/T3xQrbN8Y3EYaQUpRO5lRumB5oy+vZd/w9IbPYdvy/gVRzJXV1+ Bf6O/fpgS81txP1z+7H4VynkS50eUtxV9hYfHr9gUVlcbcxRDoqIkOCY4E6jY4s8DbFD mJrg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531xxjxPd5S63ooTkKbx2x6FfSotkf4maXNM/msYSxabvMoGmcTS RrpSyecR+HXlbIP849ZSHlM2P/c9Cs45rG78ju0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyhbjWk4xbYynOYBmsMeBuaCIFgHYTXvMzj0WoFi7C72fcR6wNrePMxB2asWRlDwpNdg3x0Ef6Fhp88UgpNQhU= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:e54c:: with SMTP id ei12mr72973286pjb.81.1637051011090; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 00:23:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211115141925.60164-1-paul@crapouillou.net> <20211115141925.60164-2-paul@crapouillou.net> In-Reply-To: <20211115141925.60164-2-paul@crapouillou.net> From: Alexandru Ardelean Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:23:19 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] iio: buffer-dma: Get rid of incoming/outgoing queues To: Paul Cercueil Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Lars-Peter Clausen , Michael Hennerich , Sumit Semwal , =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=C3=B6nig?= , linux-iio , LKML , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 4:19 PM Paul Cercueil wrote: > > The buffer-dma code was using two queues, incoming and outgoing, to > manage the state of the blocks in use. > > While this totally works, it adds some complexity to the code, > especially since the code only manages 2 blocks. It is much easier to > just check each block's state manually, and keep a counter for the next > block to dequeue. > > Since the new DMABUF based API wouldn't use these incoming and outgoing > queues anyway, getting rid of them now makes the upcoming changes > simpler. > Reviewed-by: Alexandru Ardelean > Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil > --- > drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dma.c | 68 ++++++++++---------- > include/linux/iio/buffer-dma.h | 7 +- > 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dma.c b/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dma.c > index d348af8b9705..abac88f20104 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dma.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dma.c > @@ -191,16 +191,8 @@ static struct iio_dma_buffer_block *iio_dma_buffer_alloc_block( > > static void _iio_dma_buffer_block_done(struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block) > { > - struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue = block->queue; > - > - /* > - * The buffer has already been freed by the application, just drop the > - * reference. > - */ > - if (block->state != IIO_BLOCK_STATE_DEAD) { > + if (block->state != IIO_BLOCK_STATE_DEAD) > block->state = IIO_BLOCK_STATE_DONE; > - list_add_tail(&block->head, &queue->outgoing); > - } > } > > /** > @@ -317,11 +309,8 @@ int iio_dma_buffer_request_update(struct iio_buffer *buffer) > * dead. This means we can reset the lists without having to fear > * corrution. > */ > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&queue->outgoing); > spin_unlock_irq(&queue->list_lock); > > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&queue->incoming); > - > for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(queue->fileio.blocks); i++) { > if (queue->fileio.blocks[i]) { > block = queue->fileio.blocks[i]; > @@ -346,7 +335,6 @@ int iio_dma_buffer_request_update(struct iio_buffer *buffer) > } > > block->state = IIO_BLOCK_STATE_QUEUED; > - list_add_tail(&block->head, &queue->incoming); > } > > out_unlock: > @@ -401,13 +389,18 @@ int iio_dma_buffer_enable(struct iio_buffer *buffer, > struct iio_dev *indio_dev) > { > struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue = iio_buffer_to_queue(buffer); > - struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block, *_block; > + struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block; > + unsigned int i; > > mutex_lock(&queue->lock); > queue->active = true; > - list_for_each_entry_safe(block, _block, &queue->incoming, head) { > - list_del(&block->head); > - iio_dma_buffer_submit_block(queue, block); > + queue->fileio.next_dequeue = 0; > + > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(queue->fileio.blocks); i++) { > + block = queue->fileio.blocks[i]; > + > + if (block->state == IIO_BLOCK_STATE_QUEUED) > + iio_dma_buffer_submit_block(queue, block); > } > mutex_unlock(&queue->lock); > > @@ -442,28 +435,33 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iio_dma_buffer_disable); > static void iio_dma_buffer_enqueue(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue, > struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block) > { > - if (block->state == IIO_BLOCK_STATE_DEAD) { > + if (block->state == IIO_BLOCK_STATE_DEAD) > iio_buffer_block_put(block); > - } else if (queue->active) { > + else if (queue->active) > iio_dma_buffer_submit_block(queue, block); > - } else { > + else > block->state = IIO_BLOCK_STATE_QUEUED; > - list_add_tail(&block->head, &queue->incoming); > - } > } > > static struct iio_dma_buffer_block *iio_dma_buffer_dequeue( > struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue) > { > struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block; > + unsigned int idx; > > spin_lock_irq(&queue->list_lock); > - block = list_first_entry_or_null(&queue->outgoing, struct > - iio_dma_buffer_block, head); > - if (block != NULL) { > - list_del(&block->head); > + > + idx = queue->fileio.next_dequeue; > + block = queue->fileio.blocks[idx]; > + > + if (block->state == IIO_BLOCK_STATE_DONE) { > block->state = IIO_BLOCK_STATE_DEQUEUED; > + idx = (idx + 1) % ARRAY_SIZE(queue->fileio.blocks); > + queue->fileio.next_dequeue = idx; > + } else { > + block = NULL; > } > + > spin_unlock_irq(&queue->list_lock); > > return block; > @@ -539,6 +537,7 @@ size_t iio_dma_buffer_data_available(struct iio_buffer *buf) > struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue = iio_buffer_to_queue(buf); > struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block; > size_t data_available = 0; > + unsigned int i; > > /* > * For counting the available bytes we'll use the size of the block not > @@ -552,8 +551,15 @@ size_t iio_dma_buffer_data_available(struct iio_buffer *buf) > data_available += queue->fileio.active_block->size; > > spin_lock_irq(&queue->list_lock); > - list_for_each_entry(block, &queue->outgoing, head) > - data_available += block->size; > + > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(queue->fileio.blocks); i++) { > + block = queue->fileio.blocks[i]; > + > + if (block != queue->fileio.active_block > + && block->state == IIO_BLOCK_STATE_DONE) > + data_available += block->size; > + } > + > spin_unlock_irq(&queue->list_lock); > mutex_unlock(&queue->lock); > > @@ -616,9 +622,6 @@ int iio_dma_buffer_init(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue, > queue->dev = dev; > queue->ops = ops; > > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&queue->incoming); > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&queue->outgoing); > - > mutex_init(&queue->lock); > spin_lock_init(&queue->list_lock); > > @@ -645,11 +648,8 @@ void iio_dma_buffer_exit(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue) > continue; > queue->fileio.blocks[i]->state = IIO_BLOCK_STATE_DEAD; > } > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&queue->outgoing); > spin_unlock_irq(&queue->list_lock); > > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&queue->incoming); > - > for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(queue->fileio.blocks); i++) { > if (!queue->fileio.blocks[i]) > continue; > diff --git a/include/linux/iio/buffer-dma.h b/include/linux/iio/buffer-dma.h > index ff15c61bf319..d4ed5ff39d44 100644 > --- a/include/linux/iio/buffer-dma.h > +++ b/include/linux/iio/buffer-dma.h > @@ -78,12 +78,15 @@ struct iio_dma_buffer_block { > * @active_block: Block being used in read() > * @pos: Read offset in the active block > * @block_size: Size of each block > + * @next_dequeue: index of next block that will be dequeued > */ > struct iio_dma_buffer_queue_fileio { > struct iio_dma_buffer_block *blocks[2]; > struct iio_dma_buffer_block *active_block; > size_t pos; > size_t block_size; > + > + unsigned int next_dequeue; > }; > > /** > @@ -97,8 +100,6 @@ struct iio_dma_buffer_queue_fileio { > * atomic context as well as blocks on those lists. This is the outgoing queue > * list and typically also a list of active blocks in the part that handles > * the DMA controller > - * @incoming: List of buffers on the incoming queue > - * @outgoing: List of buffers on the outgoing queue > * @active: Whether the buffer is currently active > * @fileio: FileIO state > */ > @@ -109,8 +110,6 @@ struct iio_dma_buffer_queue { > > struct mutex lock; > spinlock_t list_lock; > - struct list_head incoming; > - struct list_head outgoing; > > bool active; > > -- > 2.33.0 >