Message-ID: <ce1618f9-3b56-8670-387c-bca6181089b1@canonical.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Nov 2021 12:05:32 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.2.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: dts: sifive unmatched: Name gpio lines.
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent@gmail.com>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Heiko_St=c3=bcbner?= <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Qiu Wenbo <qiuwenbo@kylinos.com.cn>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        David Abdurachmanov <david.abdurachmanov@sifive.com>
References: <f6512cc50dc31a086e00ed59c63ea60d8c148fc4.1637023980.git.plr.vincent@gmail.com>
 <11612716.TMCrJ2abzX@diego> <20211116101713.77a0df69@gmail.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
In-Reply-To: <20211116101713.77a0df69@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 16/11/2021 11:17, Vincent Pelletier wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:39:04 +0100, Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
>> Hi Vincent,
>>
>> Am Dienstag, 16. November 2021, 01:52:56 CET schrieb Vincent Pelletier:
>>> Follow the pin descriptions given in the version 3 of the board schematics.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent@gmail.com>  
>>
>> when sending a patch series with "git format-patch -6" and friends will
>> automcatically generate x/y additions like "[PATCH 1/6]" and so on.
>>
>> Please try to keep them around when sending, as automated tools for patch
>> handling like "b4", stumble when they encounter a patch series without them.
> 
> Actually my intent was to not make this a series, as in my understanding
> independent patches should/may be submitted separately from each other.
> They just happen to be stacked, and in this order, in my working copy,
> but should not functionally have any dependency on one another (I
> believe they should even apply cleanly in any order).
> 

This should be a series because the patches, even though independent,
are logically connected/grouped as one work.

Best regards,
Krzysztof