Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 20 Nov 2001 12:51:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 20 Nov 2001 12:50:47 -0500 Received: from 24-148-25-58.na.21stcentury.net ([24.148.25.58]:52849 "EHLO danapple.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 20 Nov 2001 12:50:39 -0500 Message-Id: <200111201750.fAKHoYa03354@danapple.com> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: built-in USB /proc bug From: "Daniel I. Applebaum" Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 11:50:34 -0600 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I tried building a 2.4.13 kernel with USB support as built-in, instead of modules. The system worked, and USB devices worked, but there were no entries in /proc/bus/usb Yes, I had enabled both /proc filesystem and USB /proc filesystem support. When the same kernel was built but with USB support as modules, the /proc/bus/usb entries appear. Although no expert in these matters, I suspect that when the USB subsystem is built-in, it is initialized before /proc is mounted, and the USB /proc filesystem support either turns itself off or puts the "files" elsewhere. A viable solution might be to have make menuconfig warn against this combination. Dan. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/