Message-ID: <ebfa56a6-d444-e82e-bf0d-946765c7f8ae@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Nov 2021 16:50:23 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.2.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] KVM: arm64: Cap KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS by KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc:     kvm@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
        Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
        Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
        Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
        kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20211111162746.100598-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>
 <20211111162746.100598-2-vkuznets@redhat.com>
 <a5cdff6878b7157587e92ebe4d5af362@kernel.org> <875ysxg0s1.fsf@redhat.com>
 <87k0hd8obo.wl-maz@kernel.org>
 <ad3534bc-fe3a-55f5-b022-4dbec5f29798@redhat.com> <87y25onsj6.fsf@redhat.com>
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <87y25onsj6.fsf@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 11/16/21 14:23, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> (I'm about to send v2 as we have s390 sorted out.)
> 
> So what do we decide about ARM?
> - Current approach (kvm->arch.max_vcpus/kvm_arm_default_max_vcpus()
>   depending on 'if (kvm)') - that would be my preference.

That would be mine too.

Paolo

> - Always kvm_arm_default_max_vcpus to make the output independent on 'if
>   (kvm)'.
> - keep the status quo (drop the patch).