Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96D8C4321E for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 16:45:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA4D613A2 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 16:45:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236292AbhKPQsB (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:48:01 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:54473 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235053AbhKPQr6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:47:58 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f42.google.com ([209.85.221.42]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue109 [213.165.67.113]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M4s8v-1mnJ5p0GFb-00218h; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 17:44:58 +0100 Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id n29so38786174wra.11; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 08:44:57 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Pu/ArfUmlySO6a02Yf7NBqO4HLjPxglSldvYTlrnVpMEsNMGF eUzQgxSpnLxmgg5XsoJLDn3xFzmaK1IFUJQWUJQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw2grIH+4dQ1gxr0lKUmKxg10LDamur/1rRU/k8eCH4kwjzR81J2UBp4rpjO0VtLkw61Vdo9nn7maLYQs6F238= X-Received: by 2002:adf:efc6:: with SMTP id i6mr11299316wrp.428.1637081097413; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 08:44:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211116150119.2171-1-kernel@esmil.dk> In-Reply-To: From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 17:44:41 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/16] Basic StarFive JH7100 RISC-V SoC support To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Emil Renner Berthing , linux-riscv , DTML , linux-clk , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , "open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley , Rob Herring , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Thomas Gleixner , Marc Zyngier , Philipp Zabel , Linus Walleij , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Daniel Lezcano , Andy Shevchenko , Jiri Slaby , Maximilian Luz , Sagar Kadam , Drew Fustini , Geert Uytterhoeven , Michael Zhu , Fu Wei , Anup Patel , Atish Patra , Matteo Croce , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:nXHjagLWXDyLoZtGFzEoVJG0WRxr1si4ovftIlg49hztF+4ptef odCI6G5KRdet0VDwM3vCmG2MO3VjWRwS6ET8TTuySo6C31IM4keWlM22y7Fz3ixpGxfjemv MwJRRSVcKEzzOj0yFFZjTSmjNKnwpyY+By+z9H01scNkAkqmxZLpQUvIgKzACDB8t/9k/sK 15pTnupJqr+t7416NHQHA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:VNWLWllUTwE=:I6V1NOAcqcXXjPD7rRsz4D I+5it3cbJtwKrl+ZoqFs0C39VxK4E03fUK/XnO6v13YMiWEGt3XeH5nOyC0DgVY60EJllhqFF xj9v0kLFfxHt5uboWvgBHrDJ4Fm2edsgY4jqdcPCKtz1OBVgYqhGcVdTnfDWK17bQDEAyKzZj b0hoPuEkfkdkX0jDF/sMvYUA9FAjYQhzjtwRDTUUugpVqqibgMHdUuj4GJSFiwV5NTMwhVQVB c2HOvm28pISCFQ6SaZW9ls6eDHNQUpVNNQtvKoAF7Vu51HJ6j/7gaYT1RvH9uZgfrkcgiIDf6 UANCeAJ6KmLMeduplrG10YhQC9+EenmCJk/yW8hiHjJ2I0EjpJfAMSv4kakDFPmDu8Sciz3KA 6o/GHvIixgZWxBYhGLrRZ30eZ9R02SdSCNG1PhiqqPQKw7K5X1gzd6FgOTespo/9Z9dBEBf5/ mNXWH6ITij6mZGaefp2i237jEnmhDZ1ePXq5MbST16XsORTzKEYKGUyFjF2gUBeCZBAEo/16I d0bfnxe4bG+e+9Fqn74uMA4FDaJtgWIV6za6RfEwCsmjVkBvfbimxVpAyvpfHj+MiFH7R1XSN kpyyvc/81DzTDctnqjvGyEZjl9n2car9DPAgJdXl9x0/pZ1rEiz89tTPNl+NG8ulMxUBt+my8 ybCdPRQ3y2PajHPVeFKL+An3MkswzV+BB6iWxWylgREAzKM0Xnyl8OBM/xFtAFFieG4X43/jn TgO3AR7Wt43t3kbRquBjIQPe/4PGUXIV2fQh3X7JQp0gQGk6POFOX8+hoW/QJRKbrIRobb3k4 tdfD8vSp7V8y43+CiX5JjYyV9f8ufEjbD70vOwHwYLb+G/fKj4= Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 5:13 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 6:09 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 4:01 PM Emil Renner Berthing wrote: > > Why? > Submitting Patches tells about chronological order and last SoB to be > from the submitter. > These both are correct. Note the difference between 'last SoB' and > 'SoB to be last [line]'. > > Here is the excerpt: > "Notably, the last Signed-off-by: must always be that of the developer > submitting the patch." I think having the S-o-b in the final line is far more common, and it does help identify who added the other tags, i.e. the person signing off immediately below. I don't reject patches that do this the other way round, but it's something that felt unusual here. Arnd