Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E699CC433EF for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 16:50:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEEE263212 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 16:50:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236677AbhKPQxK (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:53:10 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44796 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235816AbhKPQxI (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:53:08 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x334.google.com (mail-wm1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::334]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3906EC061570; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 08:50:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x334.google.com with SMTP id b184-20020a1c1bc1000000b0033140bf8dd5so2886673wmb.5; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 08:50:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=hkl9GLVT+49W7M4dmZxynfDH7RpM4kbdzPvjtOxdvFU=; b=cQ/X5sHSVk0ycT0r2Dx2S1FCJ++2Xp2XIu5XilRJApmE3M+ZAE40jMn+T2tfvGvlFE D+F5ie9IvdbSRilth1ehPESUcnE3fMe/ZlnV0wbu6ELfi7WoHPa9ZfCOAkkRV8LrC/pv XNEWiyW1npFxb9ri8nvLkdcr1CPud6sl/6D2lXjAVak4HQLwxECTUz3TTb6UEiU6Dfr0 CaToNVQuz79Sabo0jNAg9GiiLyiX30KugXW1xF+uo23yvh+/AWf3h8w7N4/dvUnl/KXV Fau38Iq7QGOWAvFyZMDtVGI4AqU8xxTcjTCnq4yR3RgkT1NZ6RZ4GxEbrTstcB53tVHh HVEw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=hkl9GLVT+49W7M4dmZxynfDH7RpM4kbdzPvjtOxdvFU=; b=TCJI00d7JOAQn7iGmuvoQZjrobv/53KW0x0VjAGaoZoJx2iROBp6A4s41fmYIa4I3z nJVOjKLsmQ1jb9EJeDHXUAfGV8DV7yv2X22YY5YhVdOSnYtmB9lTFyq2iya2zxLSkNOq gUE7iafO5nvuFYhkr+FcXPep0GPkPBA1w0JAbHRRHDyKYr+Zfb0964Oa2z1SwXHD4VCy DRMQlscWiBKQZTDW9Zz5D74qpqpvAUTw5QDp2Ra+Spo0f47yRvA1Way+SZLmnz9tuQmQ +0eg79WxxIoN7nPW4i2rfiGOyz+fgJ9ia6RAnj05Og2vg0KIT2gZp4NlXjcq8kkM7QS9 gSDg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ZpLjZufiJY6CtNF1t41mkOqxyQYrdiP9MtE30M4y+zgCYBN7T EbyHEZD1OZ7PkZJ01wX5qPE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy8AsWrbQrIOcqZgTbMAJJLjJTU+7FjlnvZCVzMxEAYX0z3frH60hrX/TODUtBU5491wndn2Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2147:: with SMTP id v7mr9597639wml.36.1637081409685; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 08:50:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-2-99-153-109.as13285.net. [2.99.153.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i15sm3489634wmq.18.2021.11.16.08.50.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 16 Nov 2021 08:50:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 16:50:07 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/355] 5.4.160-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20211115165313.549179499@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211115165313.549179499@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 05:58:44PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.160 release. > There are 355 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Nov 2021 16:52:23 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 65 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 107 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/391 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip