Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 185B6C433EF for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 16:52:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F355C61A52 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 16:52:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236704AbhKPQzj (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:55:39 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45346 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236295AbhKPQzh (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:55:37 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com (mail-wr1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AB6AC061570; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 08:52:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id t30so38816603wra.10; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 08:52:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=7+Jn+St2IjENzpDxhPyfEvI27AjWPnJkawEdwNfJRK8=; b=G6AF87R42HEdDV7OfHDvDi5SWQNB8wn2NqTDZDi4w1JtJC9p+5Q+lBf9pgwN4tWiAN H0ramcM/9vownJPjh2sUU4TwmzmZn78XywfZf987QHf6GQ/fS5dgwlsDwwNLhx9hHNxT R4vUQyccZJW8qHEcT37fzOkrMtIoa71zyYIzwoUT7C1m16j2YFo3PxdgLDvgnVUzyyH+ ernPRoN+GAHZhvgTdR2YH7Nndf03SCSrI5cmIt9AY5ZdKgTXgkdujpr9IfpGvtWT1FBi K9czKifcx/pkGVLwb4PgLCRwDKmtWkaVqJ/bOSXSXWpkxUpSz7KCpS2HOuDjBgc1AHrT tfvA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=7+Jn+St2IjENzpDxhPyfEvI27AjWPnJkawEdwNfJRK8=; b=Fb2CgHjiVHgwbEZr6PueHaO0+sbVgcR0uRbhIAtbeyHofXF609nBGcJ9YiUbNfVAvA gwLYITS938ElVHiLYKZ2LoldXxa7RyhzaHrTM/+2noIyNok7szh1z0U4bMYJpan7sstV 8P203QjMC8PN+8hMRipzwxX+tMX+0/VqYk8qoD53st7E5NPYQjj6jkAtTcyPFJvhiywn FnWurVg7MefK18SyhjplGdjSTqNOeY9sB+ktf6ztl7p/ZKnlMOnQDY3DdGNv+4JI6MSl o6O8D1UbS4A0Euwiu1bvOFWlQhVSzmb27vS1Pa0ZxWGxGL80SaBLoIaqRiyZTawI+qfF t7bQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530FXM8M+D99TIkcA4NFExfS2vSsMo/YIVnPnt7hjIA748/qcrqD D7AYjlsmYb3KK7ScmafnKXA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwCLOSlr/fZ5Hvuheowlrl1k4TKX8GCoi/IJTloN4hUmDs2pNYz60NbJlKyiFaWTpfokBFXfQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:604a:: with SMTP id j10mr11282979wrt.93.1637081559006; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 08:52:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-2-99-153-109.as13285.net. [2.99.153.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u16sm2780914wmc.21.2021.11.16.08.52.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 16 Nov 2021 08:52:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 16:52:36 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/575] 5.10.80-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20211115165343.579890274@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211115165343.579890274@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 05:55:25PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.80 release. > There are 575 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Nov 2021 16:52:23 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 63 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211112): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/392 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/389 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip