Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1D2C433EF for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 22:11:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A6E61B68 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 22:11:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231699AbhKPWOI (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2021 17:14:08 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33402 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230484AbhKPWOI (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2021 17:14:08 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-xf2f.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB83FC061570 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:11:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qv1-xf2f.google.com with SMTP id s9so559501qvk.12 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:11:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vt-edu.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=j6hyh4DdZnqVKVPsdX1svAKgMhHegQMvJV2EoDFhpZc=; b=EiWMupfMYjCyDsirMoCIxHeV/JFy4OsBt6ItzFYMW9jW9fknoyNzKzpqjHLjqtCe2i EbHYvZMoTvY+KjyNlGfs0zRt8pIMJ7RfJqez16cxowzO6pdiEd6VV1r/h7U/F8Xy1/vk yyj2/OpW+GRWWoNf+2y/cyIkJXBbBJAj7sHbqLnmsG6T6Qu+5rFtwrDayWVNMz/eeNzG t8dd/xYDIa3MQAEmrXVzQ/bZgEgbAuAxn2lldQcpQ1zODg3/tgldav4sU+RTWLNoHl26 PKe+TC+PMrDQ4kUh2UdQCJl8eumKDATvHmO3vdce63GUnyySziAfQmrmqro3Z5VJvwU1 myVQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=j6hyh4DdZnqVKVPsdX1svAKgMhHegQMvJV2EoDFhpZc=; b=hOUvqfEpOKmZ10vSdr75kWKTXIs+ZpwcsPOy0I01BSuCIrmJnnfTm3dWh6opCYcvMg OCkwDaV8PvUEVcn/JOCFyJNg2sjqR0eycmZ5CX1O1QkLvPvpBLRc6XpzbbiRCvRWrvYS yYO4b701K8rK8cU8VHIN6tTQ3RA7UkSTku3FOrHNE5lGRx3gJPhizJEWXrEwY9gG1fWX A6MgYL6sF6xskkQRI/3xSxmu+/VVH8pOSF1/FaTFtTkk9QvPFhhtYpUzLSr+JUeUIe7j 6rUflfqDJKXTZCnY6JNh7nrQCalOKhJiM8X4X0jO7yFrTsP3dKOKmMRJEcvXgKzMAezP CuCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532COQMVMB07qOZMrXJB5K60/BYM6CT2toJ0lGNCsebc+Gwt+ozu xOZkZZxMbPT+gtp+wWJjHd8qng== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyMu2JZNZL43tBoXGFsgvJdf5IwHcPTfRofu5Kkcyu9EH7ioVe/o3AdA8yDRBK8zUcSy+BDmg== X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5fcb:: with SMTP id jq11mr23009101qvb.30.1637100669760; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:11:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.104] ([66.199.72.44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g14sm8734705qko.55.2021.11.16.14.11.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:11:09 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] include: linux: Reorganize timekeeping and ktime headers To: Greg KH Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Catalin Marinas , Thomas Gleixner , Matthew Wilcox , Arnd Bergmann , kbuild test robot , Linux ARM References: <095645cd-ce53-a803-cb99-522545a409b8@vt.edu> <1c156aca-d0ad-e7e8-2238-5c3d904d171c@vt.edu> <327f5c2f-b996-8aa1-cbbf-3354e01ee1f3@vt.edu> From: Carlos Bilbao Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 17:11:07 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello again, On 11/4/21 2:21 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 03:33:52PM -0400, Carlos Bilbao wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> Some time ago I sent a small patch to avoid implicit function declaration. >> In particular, timekeeping.h was using ktime_to_ns(), a static function defined >> in a header it does no include, ktime.h. Some maintainers saw this as an >> opportunity to reorganize ktime, and so I did and tested for all architectures. >> Now, this patch has fallen into the "limbo of patches", so the original problem >> remains unsolved. Please, either take a look at this or check the original >> patch for the header dependencies. > > Please just resend after 5.16-rc1 is out, there's nothing we can do with > this at this point in time. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > I think that now it is a good time to send :) Thanks! Carlos.