Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF58BC43217 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 07:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9816061BFA for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 07:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234282AbhKQHy2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2021 02:54:28 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:43182 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234265AbhKQHy0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2021 02:54:26 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A756061BD2; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 07:51:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1637135488; bh=PIonIDVLqPozXWhNNgtSU5obBsx+TJHStTWUyK9J5lQ=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=DuugzbF+T1xFu8EHEvrzBJmy8IHPZ+2ZZHevVtdquVv5aEiAq5zNm7YJNKk/JNgJy x5q6Y25EO45jAbVL9G8XqAc6LVAgjrRU4RtRIT4M7VPuqWs3QFVSvw6MvgwuvmtpSd 0L8vw6ZVhGnOHOYJerwqf2GN5Um+Mytorc7a5Vd/fwsi4wk1/iera9pKkFPgwI37oc 11KdBgKzcxOPh1sZOxdkIga4EMwMt7JvE8FHmb+rmvlXxgrA+KBmhvNKZYSK6gdlFY MQB1vdLpozCpMXnQYtF54xnE6ZHkaRyj3OPI4OxcnCuL4op3e4BDqyp2AIruyF/bB7 CCcjLvh16nLOA== Message-ID: <3939a2fac50d2e836c48855b1b00c7b36659f23f.camel@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/17] Enroll kernel keys thru MOK From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Eric Snowberg , keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, zohar@linux.ibm.com, dhowells@redhat.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, keescook@chromium.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, weiyongjun1@huawei.com, nayna@linux.ibm.com, ebiggers@google.com, ardb@kernel.org, nramas@linux.microsoft.com, lszubowi@redhat.com, jason@zx2c4.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, pjones@redhat.com Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 09:51:25 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8fcadcf2a5da5118fb7f9caea0a61440525a67b2.camel@kernel.org> References: <20211116001545.2639333-1-eric.snowberg@oracle.com> <8fcadcf2a5da5118fb7f9caea0a61440525a67b2.camel@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.4-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2021-11-17 at 09:50 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Tue, 2021-11-16 at 11:39 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 06:24:52PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > On Tue, 2021-11-16 at 11:18 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > > > > I have included=C2=A0 a link to the mokutil [5] changes I have = made to support=20 > > > > > > this new functionality.=C2=A0 The shim changes have now been ac= cepted > > > > > > upstream [6]. > > > >=20 > > > > ..snip.. > > > > > > [6] https://github.com/rhboot/shim/commit/4e513405b4f1641710115= 780d19dcec130c5208f > > > >=20 > > > > ..snip.. > > > > >=20 > > > > > Does shim have the necessary features in a release? > > > >=20 > > > > Hi! > > > >=20 > > > > It has been accepted in the upstream shim. If you are looking > > > > for a distribution having rolled out a shim with this feature (so s= igned > > > > by MSF) I fear that distributions are not that fast with shim relea= ses. > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ~~~ >=20 > Should that be MS, or what does MSF mean? >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > Also these: > > > > https://github.com/rhboot/shim/pulls > > > > https://github.com/rhboot/shim/issues > > > >=20 > > > > do mean some extra work would need to go in before an official > > > > release is cut. > > > >=20 > > > > Hope this helps? > > >=20 > > > Yes. I'll hold with this up until there is an official release. Thank= you. > >=20 > > Not sure I understand - but what are the concerns you have with shim > > code that has been accepted? >=20 > Maybe my concern is that none of the patches have a tested-by? >=20 > Probably would be easier to get a test coverage, e.g. for people like > me who do not even know how to self-compile Shim, how to setup user > space using the product and so forth. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ for the end product /Jarkko