Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70131C433EF for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 16:24:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5F061B5F for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 16:24:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239002AbhKQQ11 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2021 11:27:27 -0500 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:52827 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238476AbhKQQ10 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2021 11:27:26 -0500 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A828A5C02A7; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 11:24:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from imap44 ([10.202.2.94]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 17 Nov 2021 11:24:27 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=BxgWljCO9iWSFwR2i7hIe4GXp2Gld1dyRvcvcgoOH MU=; b=Bnpx2e9VSEw49a2vBXxiGlXpnnsiDhWiEqJ0MEHtr6QKZ0nDq/hn2xURy EMakTIV9SoTjN9a5Q8pC6DkilhmVlajjyvnKtDL8BzmSe/QKzojmIWrMjmgqG0NL km93hJQ/C8hbmpBo3M+nbVz9aifDLRAQCQKsd8OyV1JJE/InFFg87YaWS0GL0Uqp 5Vq1LLDMf4ckXPEtJwQ0lqlUmFj4dZA9de9L6RhZUjz7aQHdrmiFdf3mwMNMd+Oi g9Qv5XaT+CjEf0xHtV+CYwRchDhsQecMd1XIf63D0UvrObckz0aRa39fjw9r8ZYg O26uIzXvV/MrTmQdf4RfFX5GTWglQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrfeeggdekvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtgfesthhqredtreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdflvghr vghmhicuufholhhlvghrfdcuoehjvghrvghmhiesshihshhtvghmjeeirdgtohhmqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefggeejleffkedtieehgefhteetgeejhffhfefgueejffdtheev leefhfegkeehgfenucffohhmrghinhepkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrh fuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepjhgvrhgvmhihsehshihsthgv mhejiedrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 1637BFA0AA6; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 11:24:27 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-1371-g2296cc3491-fm-20211109.003-g2296cc34 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <87h7ccw9qc.fsf@yujinakao.com> <8951152e-12d7-0ebe-6f61-7d3de7ef28cb@opensource.wdc.com> <26826c5d-2fa6-9719-be2a-5a22d1e9abc0@opensource.wdc.com> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 09:24:06 -0700 From: "Jeremy Soller" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Krzysztof_Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , "Damien Le Moal" Cc: "Yuji Nakao" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , ". Bjorn Helgaas" , "Marc Zyngier" , "Arnd Bergmann" , "Sasha Levin" Subject: Re: Kernel 5.15 doesn't detect SATA drive on boot Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org We are using 5.15.2 right now on Pop!_OS 21.10 but have not seen SATA is= sues yet. I'll look into this, and hope it makes it into a 5.15 release soon! --=20 Jeremy Soller System76 Principal Engineer jeremy@system76.com On Tue, Nov 16, 2021, at 4:54 PM, Krzysztof Wilczy=C5=84ski wrote: > [+CC Adding Jeremy for visibility] > > Hi Damien, > > [...] >> > The error in the dmesg output (see [2] where the log file is attach= ed) >> > looks similar to the problem reported a week or so ago, as per: >> >=20 >> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/ee3884db-da17-39e3-4010-bcc8f87= 8e2f6@xenosoft.de/ >>=20 >> Thanks. I searched this thread but could not find it in the archive. >> Early morning, need more coffee :) > > No worries! Got you covered! > > ))) > ((( > +-----+ > | |] > `-----' > > Enjoy! > >>=20 >> >=20 >> > The problematic commits where reverted by Bjorn and the Pull Reques= t that >> > did it was accepted, as per: >> >=20 >> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20211111195040.GA1345641@bhelga= as/ >> >=20 >> > Thus, this would made its way into 5.16-rc1, I suppose. We might h= ave to >> > back-port this to the stable and long-term kernels. >>=20 >> Yes, I think the fix needs to go in 5.15, which is latest stable and = LTS. > > On the plus side, not everyone is on 5.15 yet, but those who are using= it would > have some issues. Albeit, with it being an LTS release, the adoption = might > increase rapidly. > > For instance, I believe that Pop!_OS already ships kernels that are ve= ry close > to the upstream, which would hit their current user base. > > Krzysztof