Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F16C433F5 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 16:41:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81FC61B98 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 16:41:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238760AbhKQQoX (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2021 11:44:23 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59338 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231874AbhKQQoT (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2021 11:44:19 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-x72f.google.com (mail-qk1-x72f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4035BC061570 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:41:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qk1-x72f.google.com with SMTP id i9so3183599qki.3 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:41:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mojatatu-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yywXD1t0aKxa5O7/b7oQn7MA8G3McZTsPmhzcEBaaqY=; b=ExVQQkxA46esbKl0Hm+BQizqZLFLgXwgHcDCpivzEYhinRR3Mu7cDf780S5It4M/3v +CZhm9Znr0KiJLOH4tj9EKJMSdokR+4Ktslvk4Rv6iJRFeqEqAs/KBmd9/CGPtbK3Bv5 S3wUXVxVwvEIRy6sQ79rOwxQ2XrjmwD46tbH1JGyxyn49LQ7wOz9FE+JCIGXWlhmM5qa 3fyY7dxtHRug5kYGtlCG+oVoBye0jk35/LGd55nVSHrZzVZbG7HJxPSx2DkOxRL+sksP 97sl6mjPVW7OMj0A67OtdhBzY5z/jZvyTvnzHFcW1AfgTxNmE/xI/FQHPfzWkbRM3i4G 2qrA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yywXD1t0aKxa5O7/b7oQn7MA8G3McZTsPmhzcEBaaqY=; b=upiQr+pN1+uHlbtpIoZjfD3Y/tAUI9kNik+B/vPTaSKl7GrN0bSrZ7+TZl2BH2XW4o Q0zm8nWn+sE5lqK1DBgOHTBZ5k4GjuDpph40asqO4Dd6Jl1+2x6CXjKszJ6XmGH50EBX Cj+abMkvxzrNCNkPxpb5y/h9v2T4xDqceG+podeUWsmYS828qv/ddWPPZn5/tOsjt26w gKiesRQjI4JVS1zIxobppv7G3b6vtSKcsn/JAlzJTVKmM4j+xFp+SfLJcCu2htwAfhtN NLiVOfIWNSuSYELMG9VYzJYLnp99j2hvABSeaEJyEotaVTbxFFlaRud7dpDqhMYq+ZwR oW0w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532v08Yxu4gXJmvBDuxY43pZABlyAlroxZBeRsYcp8chpuT2d1sb l+M6NXfp301aonPcFL/OM+trvA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyblfJl+bLY3H3VO8xZs0G9MbDqGcVZxluvJDssaYfFOkdL/wZFstqiUxbZpgGOzNU1SsOTzQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:24c9:: with SMTP id m9mr13858906qkn.317.1637167280184; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:41:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.173] (bras-base-kntaon1617w-grc-33-142-112-185-132.dsl.bell.ca. [142.112.185.132]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id j20sm165166qko.117.2021.11.17.08.41.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:41:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4ed23cd5-f4a1-aa70-183f-fbea407c19ee@mojatatu.com> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 11:41:18 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] selftests/tc-testing: add exit code Content-Language: en-US To: Jakub Kicinski , Davide Caratti Cc: Li Zhijian , shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lkp@intel.com, philip.li@intel.com References: <20211117054517.31847-1-zhijianx.li@intel.com> <20211117060535.1d47295a@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> From: Jamal Hadi Salim In-Reply-To: <20211117060535.1d47295a@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021-11-17 09:05, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 09:55:14 +0100 Davide Caratti wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 01:45:15PM +0800, Li Zhijian wrote: >>> Mark the summary result as FAIL to prevent from confusing the selftest >>> framework if some of them are failed. >>> >>> Previously, the selftest framework always treats it as *ok* even though >>> some of them are failed actually. That's because the script tdc.sh always >>> return 0. >> >> yes, also tdc was lacking support for KSFT_SKIP for a long time. > > Should this go via netdev? Is the risk of conflicts low enough > so it doesn't matter? > Yes, discussions should at minimal Cc netdev + tc maintainers. > We should probably add a MAINTAINERS entry for tdc. Adding Jamal. Did you mean adding a maintainer for tdc or just generally point who/what to involve when making changes? Typically the mailing list should be sufficient. Outside the list, at the moment, any outstanding issues on tdc are discussed/resolved in the monthly TC meetups (where all the stake holders show up)... cheers, jamal