Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030283AbXAKLJF (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:09:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030276AbXAKLJF (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:09:05 -0500 Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz ([147.32.192.36]:43123 "EHLO max.feld.cvut.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030283AbXAKLJD convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:09:03 -0500 From: CIJOML To: Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v3) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:08:41 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Jiri Kosina , Nick Piggin , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , John McCutchan , rml@novell.com References: <20070111105402.GA20027@stusta.de> In-Reply-To: <20070111105402.GA20027@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701111208.43173.cijoml@volny.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1626 Lines: 44 I all, I can't work on this until 23.2.2007 because of my diploma thesis. But my opinion is - if you make a release with this bug, you'll see more reporters soon. It can be than fixed in 2.6.20.1 - I haven't find any data corruptions yet. Michal Dne ?tvrtek 11 leden 2007 11:54 Adrian Bunk napsal(a): > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 11:21:23AM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > >Subject : BUG: at fs/inotify.c:172 set_dentry_child_flags() > > > > >References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7785 > > > > >Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov > > > > >Handled-By : John McCutchan > > > > >Status : problem is being debugged > > > > > > > > I'm not sure that this is actually a regression for 2.6.20-rc. > > > > > > The submitter says it doesn't occur in 2.6.19. > > > > Any chance that the submitter could do git bisect? (added to CC). From > > the bugzilla entry it seems to be well reproducible for him. > > That's a possible but time intensive approach for this kind of bug. > > I'd expect bisecting such an "at least 1 times a day" bug to take at > about one month. > > And that's not a high number, that's a realistic estimate considering > that you have to test a dozen kernels and verifying that a kernel is > good takes 2-3 days. > > > Jiri Kosina > > cu > Adrian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/