Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62531C433F5 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 21:03:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F3C61B64 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 21:03:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240201AbhKQVGb (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2021 16:06:31 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:52739 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230433AbhKQVGZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2021 16:06:25 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10171"; a="234294690" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.87,241,1631602800"; d="scan'208";a="234294690" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Nov 2021 13:03:26 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.87,241,1631602800"; d="scan'208";a="536439178" Received: from paasikivi.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.42]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Nov 2021 13:03:24 -0800 Received: from paasikivi.fi.intel.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by paasikivi.fi.intel.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2EF7C2030F; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 23:03:22 +0200 (EET) Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 23:03:22 +0200 From: Sakari Ailus To: Eugen.Hristev@microchip.com Cc: leonl@leopardimaging.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, skomatineni@nvidia.com, luca@lucaceresoli.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: i2c: imx274: fix s_frame_interval runtime resume not requested Message-ID: References: <20211117154009.261787-1-eugen.hristev@microchip.com> <97fbf01c-6cfb-7ab9-f045-383a1e4053c2@microchip.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <97fbf01c-6cfb-7ab9-f045-383a1e4053c2@microchip.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Eugen, On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 04:52:40PM +0000, Eugen.Hristev@microchip.com wrote: > On 11/17/21 6:11 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > > > Hi Eugen, > > > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 05:40:09PM +0200, Eugen Hristev wrote: > >> pm_runtime_resume_and_get should be called when the s_frame_interval > >> is called. > >> > >> The driver will try to access device registers to configure VMAX, coarse > >> time and exposure. > >> > >> Currently if the runtime is not resumed, this fails: > >> # media-ctl -d /dev/media0 --set-v4l2 '"IMX274 1-001a":0[fmt:SRGGB10_1X10/3840x2 > >> 160@1/10]' > >> > >> IMX274 1-001a: imx274_binning_goodness: ask 3840x2160, size 3840x2160, goodness 0 > >> IMX274 1-001a: imx274_binning_goodness: ask 3840x2160, size 1920x1080, goodness -3000 > >> IMX274 1-001a: imx274_binning_goodness: ask 3840x2160, size 1280x720, goodness -4000 > >> IMX274 1-001a: imx274_binning_goodness: ask 3840x2160, size 1280x540, goodness -4180 > >> IMX274 1-001a: __imx274_change_compose: selected 1x1 binning > >> IMX274 1-001a: imx274_set_frame_interval: input frame interval = 1 / 10 > >> IMX274 1-001a: imx274_read_mbreg : addr 0x300e, val=0x1 (2 bytes) > >> IMX274 1-001a: imx274_set_frame_interval : register SVR = 1 > >> IMX274 1-001a: imx274_read_mbreg : addr 0x30f6, val=0x6a8 (2 bytes) > >> IMX274 1-001a: imx274_set_frame_interval : register HMAX = 1704 > >> IMX274 1-001a: imx274_set_frame_length : input length = 2112 > >> IMX274 1-001a: imx274_write_mbreg : i2c bulk write failed, 30f8 = 884 (3 bytes) > >> IMX274 1-001a: imx274_set_frame_length error = -121 > >> IMX274 1-001a: imx274_set_frame_interval error = -121 > >> Unable to setup formats: Remote I/O error (121) > >> > >> The device is not resumed thus the remote I/O error. > >> > >> Setting the frame interval works at streaming time, because > >> pm_runtime_resume_and_get is called at s_stream time before sensor setup. > >> The failure happens when only the s_frame_interval is called separately > >> independently on streaming time. > >> > >> Fixes: ad97bc37426c ("media: i2c: imx274: Add IMX274 power on and off sequence" > >> Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev > >> --- > >> drivers/media/i2c/imx274.c | 5 +++++ > >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx274.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx274.c > >> index e89ef35a71c5..6e63fdcc5e46 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx274.c > >> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx274.c > >> @@ -1420,6 +1420,10 @@ static int imx274_s_frame_interval(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, > >> int min, max, def; > >> int ret; > >> > >> + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&imx274->client->dev); > >> + if (ret < 0) > >> + return ret; > >> + > >> mutex_lock(&imx274->lock); > >> ret = imx274_set_frame_interval(imx274, fi->interval); > >> > >> @@ -1451,6 +1455,7 @@ static int imx274_s_frame_interval(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, > >> > >> unlock: > >> mutex_unlock(&imx274->lock); > >> + pm_runtime_put(&imx274->client->dev); > >> > >> return ret; > >> } > > > > If the device is powered off in the end, could you instead not power it on > > in the first place? I.e. see how this works for the s_ctrl() callback. > > > Hi Sakari, > > I tried this initially, as in s_ctrl, > > if (!pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(&imx274->client->dev)) > > return 0; > > > However, if the device is powered off, the s_frame_interval does not do > anything (return 0), and the frame interval is not changed. Not even the > internal structure frame_interval is updated (as this is updated after > configuring the actual device). > And in consequence media-ctl -p will still print the old frame interval. > > So either we power on the device to set everything, or, things have to > be set in the software struct and written once streaming starts. > I am in favor of the first option (hence the patch), to avoid having > configuration that was requested but not written to the device itself. > The second option would require some rework to move the software part > before the hardware part, and to assume that the hardware part never > fails in bounds or by other reason (or the software part would be no > longer consistent) > > What do you think ? Seems reasonable, but the driver is hardly doing this in an exemplary way. Still the rework might not worth the small gain. I'll take this one then. -- Kind regards, Sakari Ailus