MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20211116200739.924401-1-mka@chromium.org> <20211116120642.v17.1.I7c9a1f1d6ced41dd8310e8a03da666a32364e790@changeid>
In-Reply-To: <20211116120642.v17.1.I7c9a1f1d6ced41dd8310e8a03da666a32364e790@changeid>
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Date:   Wed, 17 Nov 2021 16:11:34 -0800
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=VnRQzvgjVzTNgx5kaC6VDvFGvTx2njtdTo27LW1zxWJA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 1/7] usb: misc: Add onboard_usb_hub driver
To:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
        Peter Chen <peter.chen@kernel.org>, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
        Ravi Chandra Sadineni <ravisadineni@chromium.org>,
        Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 12:07 PM Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> --- a/drivers/usb/misc/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/usb/misc/Kconfig
> @@ -284,3 +284,20 @@ config BRCM_USB_PINMAP
>           This option enables support for remapping some USB external
>           signals, which are typically on dedicated pins on the chip,
>           to any gpio.
> +
> +config USB_ONBOARD_HUB
> +       tristate "Onboard USB hub support"

Aren't you back to shenanigans now that you're being called straight
from the USB core? What if you're a module and the USB core is
builtin? It can't call you, right? ...or what if you're builtin but
the USB core is a module (yeah, I know that sounds insane but I don't
think anything technically prevents it)?

Can you just add a dependency here such that if the USB core is a
module that you're a module and if the USB core is builtin that you're
builtin?


> +void onboard_hub_create_pdevs(struct usb_device *parent_hub, struct list_head *pdev_list)
> +{
> +       int i;
> +       struct device_node *np, *npc;
> +       struct platform_device *pdev;
> +       struct pdev_list_entry *pdle;
> +
> +       INIT_LIST_HEAD(pdev_list);
> +
> +       for (i = 1; i <= parent_hub->maxchild; i++) {
> +               np = usb_of_get_device_node(parent_hub, i);
> +               if (!np)
> +                       continue;
> +
> +               if (!of_is_onboard_usb_hub(np))
> +                       goto node_put;
> +
> +               npc = of_parse_phandle(np, "companion-hub", 0);
> +               if (!npc)
> +                       goto create_pdev;
> +
> +               pdev = of_find_device_by_node(npc);
> +               of_node_put(npc);
> +
> +               if (pdev) {
> +                       /* the companion hub already has a platform device, nothing to do here */
> +                       put_device(&pdev->dev);
> +                       goto node_put;
> +               }
> +
> +create_pdev:

I don't really like this "goto". I'd rather just use an "if" test for
the few lines even if the indentation gets to be a bit much.

-Doug