Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74552C433EF for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 06:26:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58EA76138B for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 06:26:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243384AbhKRG3o (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2021 01:29:44 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47224 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243387AbhKRG3f (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2021 01:29:35 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-x22b.google.com (mail-oi1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BC6FC061570; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 22:26:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oi1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id q25so12207278oiw.0; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 22:26:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zC3lGC5vP7hv7dugfu+cJwFjkb/yK58mvfwGdIvQ6+Q=; b=UJyHTSrqgpc6qSJ7dtKuhmvl7CwjoI5Be72JM1kVeyHWFvCxlgyJNjGnIduhZKKT2N LoIyvADcLPOPnFUb6sZ2mtqFBs4yCWrB/fMRcekgbzrM13tqZUOkMzDUwOSy4hBc+0S3 wp2YoJxgUdLE5vtcGnCCxtNhebWj0ls3CXaiIPR9TQC6/oG/bUNLpZDGTCliKzGi8ECU 3hc8lSj+6ZSqPm5Gw9qzi5MZ+F4XpE71/C3kRTUwjWN1h1WJAdQVmILK/6cE1vZUOvYm VCRNtwThsFluQvZBAq1OhN5WpRe5SnRGKt5yRHtYGFOPOqvlx9SJz5oDp/vWR88nF9kY F2XQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zC3lGC5vP7hv7dugfu+cJwFjkb/yK58mvfwGdIvQ6+Q=; b=Tiz02LPyo0AgTYq6MVSnqSxYY3JOruYk6nttponROFKsXP57fAr8S0HNgYX5cbVzVM BKNGHOgVdBIGpEXp1d5nkYbAJeG4wNd5pg8G0XcqWn8dp0dKSdzCcq1zs7fjs9JwzK94 OXOcp/xgGyg00F336Hqd4NJ6WL+jZsRHOo0VUmMR3CIC6ExEca4McMuoAtvCjegag16N BP4UIowm5YIfTMqHhZlYQmWm5+tu5YZpsBa8QZokqa0qf0R+tGO+vLQON6Mu6vSqd9Nm 3XHh8MsbVD6+QSu6JQekkayAU135vpBwDOVzEBb3wq83fKIaW6t5VLNOxFhhRYbaG06x UThg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533/mrkJTo53mPvTs7Hjj6hgc3xpiPohJecHAukg0sqVuy00xynG spnkxsIGTjP3J+hm7w59P1c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwA0Q3XlpFWj5xMSUo2FP2f9bsNXHhPMSNIPkd6MOQOLgbPY7tF3VlylTWmaC9TA1g+gURyGA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:53:: with SMTP id v19mr5666603oic.8.1637216794882; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 22:26:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from server.roeck-us.net ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bi20sm645377oib.29.2021.11.17.22.26.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Nov 2021 22:26:34 -0800 (PST) Sender: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/923] 5.15.3-rc3 review To: Kees Cook , Linus Torvalds Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Holger_Hoffst=c3=a4tte?= , Qi Zheng , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Thomas Gleixner , Justin Forbes , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Shuah Khan , patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Pavel Machek , Jon Hunter , Florian Fainelli , stable , Wang Yugui , =?UTF-8?Q?Fran=c3=a7ois_Guerraz?= , Josh Poimboeuf References: <20211117101657.463560063@linuxfoundation.org> <55c7b316-e03d-9e91-d74c-fea63c469b3b@applied-asynchrony.com> <202111171609.56F12BD@keescook> From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: <7bc0d46b-1412-a630-bbf7-57e7ec702784@roeck-us.net> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 22:26:31 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <202111171609.56F12BD@keescook> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/17/21 4:16 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 03:50:17PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> Sorry for top-posting and quoting this all, but the actual people >> involved with the wchan changes don't seem to be on the participant >> list. > > Adding more folks from a private report and > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215031 > > and for the new people, here's a lore link for this thread: > https://lore.kernel.org/stable/YZV02RCRVHIa144u@fedora64.linuxtx.org/ > > > FWIW, earlier bisection pointed to the stable backport of > 5d1ceb3969b6b2e47e2df6d17790a7c5a20fcbb4 being the primary culprit. > At first glance it seems to me that the problem with -stable is that an > unvetted subset of the wchan refactoring series landed in -stable. > Can the (partial) wchan backport possibly be dropped from v5.15.y until someone figures out what exactly - if anything - is needed ? Thanks, Guenter