Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05149C433EF for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 08:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCBFD61B3E for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 08:56:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243641AbhKRI7y (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2021 03:59:54 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52264 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S244818AbhKRI6c (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2021 03:58:32 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x434.google.com (mail-wr1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::434]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D7ECC061226 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 00:55:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id w29so10012936wra.12 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 00:55:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=dSP+w0ULKXB14fx0Qg6uZmQEgEDOZqwyyo7QWe1WeRA=; b=ydGmwL4bJDWdRowxUjZt8fkHicYan+sgcnHB3CDDWdrWIZ8SfGCvjnttvQl6Av5vlr s6PrLg6WG4iAClWRg4ABvIUY5CoPtZ1J8dPHr9UUowjjMD4oV4y3F/fStxNQWSI7JIhu Wl17LV+jYNskvi1g3OB4pI+WRDya+Ni66dYqqj1oORgx93UMAo4F6oQHfWVjY0kjzNOF b0a/2g4B9e0VFYvtAFTw52qfI+9oxP11ske5S/1xGpCj0YjTW5PflN3gXSTlO9I4Lhdl o5dbw2PJfgAiIgVp0fOOzgRhSj1XSewWVex+fR/7KOeHmaWcgDV5BBO2HSumFII0Xmav S53g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=dSP+w0ULKXB14fx0Qg6uZmQEgEDOZqwyyo7QWe1WeRA=; b=2hlkgk4QPXKh4dq8aqZICaxZvCBI3F5UEccpqn0aOkogaSWmcdI4d4wxyY1pZAVche K21NBeC7noitNmtgTlfzh7E9T8vAfH3fdwOIbM8nuu+nKSnNPcnQt83y58Lgkp4hFuI3 wdPZ0WJhe9+XzYtQ/mBA8/m+/gZBpT8rXORzcVCkZvkd06SR+Ug6wHD38Fs05/sxKOVn nmOsChWEX8iJeGRB1U9sbEqHfzTAN+t4da8oH1J4qaeO/TZN9ZUkUZdMPww8JVSRrCEE d7eOpwIHpLNOfq3ZnHEkAItlBR80IZ+SPvjeqJr5Bdz7uxQAGHy7jIkEWkD4RfhlTLW2 AovQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530njzvQUYTtcsoda2Pz2y3bkVo7htXGCfNjeqEFDZxJM9G/xYQ1 RXAMSYNmf82hPFqQQQmAHAp/IA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxCrYvy/KHbOLzaUjVIo3pWbsYkJIUI9dO/1fGCACLzErizkkHVQ37qGCEiCScVrzOKly2AKQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:d1cb:: with SMTP id b11mr30566144wrd.33.1637225717048; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 00:55:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com ([95.148.6.231]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n129sm2279008wmn.36.2021.11.18.00.55.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 18 Nov 2021 00:55:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 08:55:14 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Matti Vaittinen , Andy Shevchenko , Matti Vaittinen , Lukas Bulwahn , Rob Herring , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Linus Walleij , devicetree , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , linux-power Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/4] Drop ROHM BD70528 support Message-ID: References: <50c260a1-c6d0-1a0b-45da-ab1a2d1379c3@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 16 Nov 2021, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 7:41 PM Matti Vaittinen > wrote: > > > > On 11/16/21 18:10, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 2:52 PM Matti Vaittinen > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Drop ROHM BD70528 support > > >> > > >> Unfortunately there has not been a big demand for ROHM BD70528 > > >> IC. The few users I know control PMIC from separate M4-core, > > >> which is not running Linux. I am not aware of any users of this > > >> Linux driver. > > >> > > >> While I did really like this IC and writing the drivers for it, > > >> seems like these drivers are becoming useless burden. So, I see > > >> no point in maintaining them. Let's just drop the drivers if > > >> there is no objections to this series. :( > > >> > > >> The regulator, WDG and power-supply drivers were already dropped. > > >> > > >> The RTC and clk drivers remain in use by few other ROHM IC drivers. > > >> Nevertheless, they are already converted to not depend the BD70528 > > >> defines during previous cycle. > > >> > > >> This series cleans the remaining pieces, GPIO, MFD, dt-bindings and > > >> MAINTAINER entries. The GPIO code uses defines from MFD - but the GPIO > > >> part is also depending on MFD KConfig entry - so there should be no > > >> breakages even if the patches were applied to respective subsystem trees > > >> and were not carried via single tree. > > > > > > FWIW, no objections from me. > > > > Thanks Andy! > > > > I see acks from Andu, Bartosz, Lee and Rob. It'd be nice to see ack from > > Linus W too - but other than that - I guess this is good to go. Any > > preferences regarding the tree(s) that could carry the patches? All via > > MFD or each patch merged to the subsystem it fits the best? > > > > Best Regards > > Matti Vaittinen > > Normally Lee takes MFD patches together with those touching relevant subsystems. Yep, it's on the list. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog