Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85ABFC433F5 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 17:17:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F48161423 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 17:17:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234048AbhKRRUK (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2021 12:20:10 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55008 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233968AbhKRRUI (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2021 12:20:08 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x102f.google.com (mail-pj1-x102f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F09B3C061574 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 09:17:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x102f.google.com with SMTP id np3so5636922pjb.4 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 09:17:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=AdNT/e8pWXEGx8y2cLNzuIqObGx1yOxX/rki3SqI27w=; b=MzTqRS09IIUcxWl66e1N7K7IoW9LHDC2F49Jzm7N7j1I2b0puAw8fiVyiEVrEuWvnf 9tDhXaxNBb6fRjmFnxmmjF0rB1qECOcxQFw9jwxVEEF1zCXpIpg1HdzSywathMEU6O06 mOzoAzahrTv+Vfrb6K7uqj27+8J9baKgZuirI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=AdNT/e8pWXEGx8y2cLNzuIqObGx1yOxX/rki3SqI27w=; b=2jd+jHcNZnh04yTJojZZbtOnqX3DI0PKnaPN5X7FojjxxRxwo1x/QXaumuyl/DMyE/ uC+4Rt94yPzszsBZUc4AOPCIjyby6QaRbmpJYlh13AEaiETmCc7U7a8gCc5Io66XUXdq AfcJGOmsk7qwl0zjX0lcWHud2meFWYzZ/ZtBiL0hdC+HKvBvpI2mHZgfprBEQQqkJCLQ LNigkEOi9900KlBjuXMzZsdGBkY2faJ6XjdUcMPNFHym+/ZOLuUD5Pfb3fw8p6sOgIpm DH6bUriizJPnkMH+vnZjGdH3XFElCtzOHJIuimV2WTBMPCr/GVmS91cl/Lqz2j5O+7Yb VngA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533BYPnjZG2xrBqmfXmLxYHAHq0FIewTmhTVKSrisLVEsM3b0Xng TykuAyWXZ55COQN9sZIMOQM8bQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxv5htguG5dAaQZenD+5ssUM5X/WV7alFh5ZEYdsEe8SMjBS2O4lsEoq9SmDTw7delwgAsoiA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:1a55:: with SMTP id 21mr11950889pjl.240.1637255825349; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 09:17:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o7sm195449pgq.59.2021.11.18.09.17.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 18 Nov 2021 09:17:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 09:17:04 -0800 From: Kees Cook To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Linus Torvalds , Holger =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hoffst=E4tte?= , Qi Zheng , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Thomas Gleixner , Justin Forbes , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Guenter Roeck , Shuah Khan , patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Pavel Machek , Jon Hunter , Florian Fainelli , stable , Wang Yugui , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Guerraz , Josh Poimboeuf Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/923] 5.15.3-rc3 review Message-ID: <202111180912.356B342@keescook> References: <20211117101657.463560063@linuxfoundation.org> <55c7b316-e03d-9e91-d74c-fea63c469b3b@applied-asynchrony.com> <202111171609.56F12BD@keescook> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 09:12:59AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 04:16:51PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 03:50:17PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > Sorry for top-posting and quoting this all, but the actual people > > > involved with the wchan changes don't seem to be on the participant > > > list. > > > > Adding more folks from a private report and > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215031 > > > > and for the new people, here's a lore link for this thread: > > https://lore.kernel.org/stable/YZV02RCRVHIa144u@fedora64.linuxtx.org/ > > > > > > FWIW, earlier bisection pointed to the stable backport of > > 5d1ceb3969b6b2e47e2df6d17790a7c5a20fcbb4 being the primary culprit. > > At first glance it seems to me that the problem with -stable is that an > > unvetted subset of the wchan refactoring series landed in -stable. > > What would be the vetted subset? :) The ones with "Cc: stable" ;) > Anyway, I have now dropped the following patches that were in the > 5.15.3-rc tree: > bc9bbb81730e ("x86: Fix get_wchan() to support the ORC unwinder") > 42a20f86dc19 ("sched: Add wrapper for get_wchan() to keep task blocked") > 5d1ceb3969b6 ("x86: Fix __get_wchan() for !STACKTRACE") > > And will push out another -rc release to let people test. > > If there are any other commits I should have also dropped, please let me > know. That looks right to me. These three were part of Peter's much larger wchan refactoring (of which 42a20f86dc19 was a core part). Thanks! -- Kees Cook