Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B15DC433EF for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 19:02:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A91961B04 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 19:02:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231825AbhKRTFQ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2021 14:05:16 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55986 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229574AbhKRTFO (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2021 14:05:14 -0500 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8FA1C611F2; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 19:02:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 14:02:11 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Cc: "Yordan Karadzhov \(VMware\)" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, mingo@redhat.com, hagen@jauu.net, rppt@kernel.org, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, vvs@virtuozzo.com, shakeelb@google.com, christian.brauner@ubuntu.com, mkoutny@suse.com, Linux Containers Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] namespacefs: Proof-of-Concept Message-ID: <20211118140211.7d7673fb@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <87a6i1xpis.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> References: <20211118181210.281359-1-y.karadz@gmail.com> <87a6i1xpis.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 12:55:07 -0600 ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote: > Nacked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" > > Eric Eric, As you can see, the subject says "Proof-of-Concept" and every patch in the the series says "RFC". All you did was point out problems with no help in fixing those problems, and then gave a nasty Nacked-by before it even got into a conversation. From this response, I have to say: It is not correct to nack a proof of concept that is asking for discussion. So, I nack your nack, because it's way to early to nack this. -- Steve