Date:   Thu, 18 Nov 2021 15:54:02 -0800
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
        Robert O'Callahan <rocallahan@gmail.com>,
        Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@intel.com>, lkp@lists.01.org,
        lkp@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] signal: Don't always set SA_IMMUTABLE for forced
 signals
Message-ID: <202111181553.A4FDEB1@keescook>
References: <CAP045AqjHRL=bcZeQ-O+-Yh4nS93VEW7Mu-eE2GROjhKOa-VxA@mail.gmail.com>
 <87k0h6334w.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org>
 <202111171341.41053845C3@keescook>
 <CAHk-=wgkOGmkTu18hJQaJ4mk8hGZc16=gzGMgGGOd=uwpXsdyw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAP045ApYXxhiAfmn=fQM7_hD58T-yx724ctWFHO4UAWCD+QapQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=wiCRbSvUi_TnQkokLeM==_+Tow0GsQXnV3UYwhsxirPwg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAP045AoqssLTKOqse1t1DG1HgK9h+goG8C3sqgOyOV3Wwq+LDA@mail.gmail.com>
 <202111171728.D85A4E2571@keescook>
 <87h7c9qg7p.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org>
 <877dd5qfw5.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <877dd5qfw5.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 04:04:58PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> 
> Recently to prevent issues with SECCOMP_RET_KILL and similar signals
> being changed before they are delivered SA_IMMUTABLE was added.
> 
> Unfortunately this broke debuggers[1][2] which reasonably expect to be
> able to trap synchronous SIGTRAP and SIGSEGV even when the target
> process is not configured to handle those signals.
> 
> Update force_sig_to_task to support both the case when we can
> allow the debugger to intercept and possibly ignore the
> signal and the case when it is not safe to let userspace
> known about the signal until the process has exited.
> 
> Reported-by: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAP045AoMY4xf8aC_4QU_-j7obuEPYgTcnQQP3Yxk=2X90jtpjw@mail.gmail.com
> [2] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211117150258.GB5403@xsang-OptiPlex-902
> Fixes: 00b06da29cf9 ("signal: Add SA_IMMUTABLE to ensure forced siganls do not get changed")
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> ---
>  kernel/signal.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
> index 7c4b7ae714d4..02058c983bd6 100644
> --- a/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -1298,6 +1298,12 @@ int do_send_sig_info(int sig, struct kernel_siginfo *info, struct task_struct *p
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +enum sig_handler {
> +	HANDLER_CURRENT, /* If reachable use the current handler */
> +	HANDLER_SIG_DFL, /* Always use SIG_DFL handler semantics */
> +	HANDLER_EXIT,	 /* Only visible as the proces exit code */

Oh, I just noticed this typo "proces" -> "process"

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook