Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 20 Nov 2001 14:42:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 20 Nov 2001 14:42:32 -0500 Received: from ns.ithnet.com ([217.64.64.10]:43272 "HELO heather.ithnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 20 Nov 2001 14:41:12 -0500 Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 20:41:05 +0100 From: Stephan von Krawczynski To: linux-kernel Subject: problem with NAT on 2.4 Message-Id: <20011120204105.4785bc97.skraw@ithnet.com> Organization: ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, I am using a SuSE 7.3 distro kernel 2.4.10 and ran into some really strange problem with NAT. I have a private network setup (192.168.3.x) with win-clients (win98, W2K) and a variety of IE-browsers. From this network I wanted to grant direct access to the internet via NAT. Basically it works, but what does not work is a http-connection from _any_ tested win client over linux NAT to a certain MS IIS 5.0. I wouldn't be that bothered if the exact same clients wouldn't connect flawlessly over a 50 bucks DSL-router to the same IIS. Other servers (whatever I tried) seem to work, but not the really important one (Murphy of course ;-). Does anybody have an idea why NAT in 2.4.10 wouldn't work like NAT in some cheap dsl-router equipment regarding http-connections? Is there any sense in upgrading to 2.4.15-preX? I even tried some gateway software based on windoze that is able to NAT - and it works too! I pretty much ran out of ideas... Regards, Stephan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/